Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0131469015 = product of:
  0.026293803 = sum of:
    0.026293803 = product of:
      0.052587606 = sum of:
        0.052587606 = weight(_text_:online in 5186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052587606 = score(doc=5186,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.33194235 = fieldWeight in 5186, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5186)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

When an item catalogued in a library's bibliographic database consists of more than a sole work, it may be difficult to link the works to the item. For the retrieval of such works, online catalogues currently rely on contents notes and added entry fields. Suggests 4 criteria for analytic catalogues: a search for a specific work should retrieve all units of that work; it should retrieve only that work without false drops; the search should require only one pass; and the resulting display should clearly collocate all retrieved works. Suggests that 'In' analytics as described in AACR2 rule 13.5A promise better results than analytic entries based on contents notes and added entries