Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hood, W.W."
  • × author_ss:"Wilson, C.S."
  1. Hood, W.W.; Wilson, C.S.: Solving problems in library and information science using Fuzzy set theory (2002) 0.01
    0.005757545 = product of:
      0.02303018 = sum of:
        0.02303018 = weight(_text_:information in 814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02303018 = score(doc=814,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 814, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=814)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Various mathematical tools and theories have found application in Library and Information Science (LIS). One of these is Fuzzy Set Theory (FST). FST is a generalization of classical Set Theory, designed to better model situations where membership of a set is not discrete but is "fuzzy." The theory dates from 1965, when Lotfi Zadeh published his seminal paper on the topic. As well as mathematical developments and extensions of the theory itself, there have been many applications of FST to such diverse areas as medical diagnoses and washing machines. The theory has also found application in a number of aspects of LIS. Information Retrieval (IR) is one area where FST can prove useful; this paper reviews IR applications of FST. Another major area of Information Science in which FST has found application is Informetrics; these studies are also reviewed. A few examples of the use of this theory in non-LIS domains are also examined.
    Footnote
    Artikel in einem Themenheft "Current theory in library and information science"
  2. Hood, W.W.; Wilson, C.S.: ¬The relationship of records in multiple databases to their usage or citedness (2005) 0.00
    0.0030039945 = product of:
      0.012015978 = sum of:
        0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 3680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012015978 = score(doc=3680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3680)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.9, S.1004-1007
  3. Hood, W.W.; Wilson, C.S.: ¬The scatter of documents over databases in different subject domains : how many databases are needed? (2001) 0.00
    0.0021457102 = product of:
      0.008582841 = sum of:
        0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 6936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008582841 = score(doc=6936,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 6936, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6936)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.14, S.1242-1254
  4. Hood, W.W.; Wilson, C.S.: Overlap in bibliographic databases (2003) 0.00
    0.0021457102 = product of:
      0.008582841 = sum of:
        0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008582841 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.12, S.1091-1103