Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hook, P.A."
  1. Hook, P.A.; Gantchev, A.: Using combined metadata sources to visualize a small library (OBL's English Language Books) (2017) 0.02
    0.01797695 = product of:
      0.0359539 = sum of:
        0.0359539 = product of:
          0.0719078 = sum of:
            0.0719078 = weight(_text_:subject in 3870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0719078 = score(doc=3870,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550679 = queryNorm
                0.4418043 = fieldWeight in 3870, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3870)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Data from multiple knowledge organization systems are combined to provide a global overview of the content holdings of a small personal library. Subject headings and classification data are used to effectively map the combined book and topic space of the library. While harvested and manipulated by hand, the work reveals issues and potential solutions when using automated techniques to produce topic maps of much larger libraries. The small library visualized consists of the thirty-nine, digital, English language books found in the Osama Bin Laden (OBL) compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan upon his death. As this list of books has garnered considerable media attention, it is worth providing a visual overview of the subject content of these books - some of which is not readily apparent from the titles. Metadata from subject headings and classification numbers was combined to create book-subject maps. Tree maps of the classification data were also produced. The books contain 328 subject headings. In order to enhance the base map with meaningful thematic overlay, library holding count data was also harvested (and aggregated from duplicates). This additional data revealed the relative scarcity or popularity of individual books.
  2. Hook, P.A.: Using course-subject Co-occurrence (CSCO) to reveal the structure of an academic discipline : a framework to evaluate different inputs of a domain map (2017) 0.01
    0.011369622 = product of:
      0.022739245 = sum of:
        0.022739245 = product of:
          0.04547849 = sum of:
            0.04547849 = weight(_text_:subject in 3324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04547849 = score(doc=3324,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550679 = queryNorm
                0.27942157 = fieldWeight in 3324, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3324)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article proposes, exemplifies, and validates the use of course-subject co-occurrence (CSCO) data to generate topic maps of an academic discipline. A CSCO event is when 2 course-subjects are taught in the same academic year by the same teacher. A total of 61,856 CSCO events were extracted from the 2010-11 directory of the American Association of Law Schools and used to visualize the structure of law school education in the United States. Different normalization, ordination (layout), and clustering algorithms were compared and the best performing algorithm of each type was used to generate the final map. Validation studies demonstrate that CSCO produces topic maps that are consistent with expert opinion and 4 other indicators of the topical similarity of law school course-subjects. This research is the first to use CSCO to produce a visualization of a domain. It is also the first to use an expanded, multi-part gold standard to evaluate the validity of domain maps and the intermediate steps in their creation. It is suggested that the framework used herein may be adopted for other studies that compare different inputs of a domain map in order to empirically derive the best maps as measured against extrinsic sources of topical similarity (gold standards).