Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Huber, J.C."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Huber, J.C.; Wagner-Döbler, R.: Using the Mann-Whitney test on informetric data (2003) 0.00
    2.6310782E-4 = product of:
      0.0039466172 = sum of:
        0.0039466172 = product of:
          0.0078932345 = sum of:
            0.0078932345 = weight(_text_:information in 1686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0078932345 = score(doc=1686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.8, S.798-801
  2. Huber, J.C.: ¬A new method for analyzing scientific productivity (2001) 0.00
    2.3255666E-4 = product of:
      0.0034883497 = sum of:
        0.0034883497 = product of:
          0.0069766995 = sum of:
            0.0069766995 = weight(_text_:information in 6845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0069766995 = score(doc=6845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 6845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Previously, a new method for measuring scientific productivity was demonstrated for authors in mathematical logic and some subareas of 19th-century physics. The purpose of this article is to apply this new method to other fields to support its general applicability. We show that the method yields the same results for modern physicists, biologists, psychologists, inventors, and composers. That is, each individual's production is constant over time, and the time-period fluctuations follow the Poisson distribution. However, the productivity (e.g., papers per year) varies widely across individuals. We show that the distribution of productivity does not follow the normal (i.e., bell curve) distribution, but rather follows the exponential distribution. Thus, most authors produce at the lowest rate and very few authors produce at the higher rates. We also show that the career duration of individuals follows the exponential distribution. Thus, most authors have a very short career and very few have a long career. The principal advantage of the new method is that the detail structure of author productivity can be examined, such as trends, etc. Another advantage is that information science studies have guidance for the length of time interval being examined and estimating when an author's entire body of work has been recorded.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.13, S.1089-1099
  3. Huber, J.C.: ¬A new model that generated Lotka's law (2002) 0.00
    2.3021935E-4 = product of:
      0.00345329 = sum of:
        0.00345329 = product of:
          0.00690658 = sum of:
            0.00690658 = weight(_text_:information in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00690658 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.3, S.209-219