Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0010818016 = product of:
  0.009736214 = sum of:
    0.003800067 = weight(_text_:in in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003800067 = score(doc=3691,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
    0.0059361467 = product of:
      0.01780844 = sum of:
        0.01780844 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01780844 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.11111111 = coord(2/18)

Abstract

Ideally, intersystem relations complement highly expressive and thoroughly structured relational indexing languages. The relational structures of the participating systems contribute to the meaning of the individual terms or classes. When conceptualizing mapping relations the structural and functional design of the respective systems must be fully taken into account. As intersystem relations may differ considerably from familiar interconcept relations, the creation of an adequate inventory that is general in coverage and specific in depth demands a deep understanding of the requirements and properties of mapping relations. The characteristics of specific mapping relations largely rely on the characteristics of the systems they are intended to connect. The detailed declaration of differences and peculiarities of specific mapping relations is an important prerequisite for modelling these relations. First approaches towards specifying

Date

22. 7.2010 17:11:51

6.5957184E-4 = product of:
  0.011872293 = sum of:
    0.011872293 = product of:
      0.03561688 = sum of:
        0.03561688 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03561688 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.055555556 = coord(1/18)

Date

22. 9.2008 19:30:41

4.4506913E-4 = product of:
  0.008011244 = sum of:
    0.008011244 = weight(_text_:in in 4780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008011244 = score(doc=4780,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 4780, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4780)
  0.055555556 = coord(1/18)

Abstract

Within the frame of the methodological support of the CrissCross project and the research conducted in the Reseda project, a tiered model of semantic interoperability was developed. This correlates methods of establishing semantic interoperability and types of intersystem relations to search functionalities in retrieval scenarios. In this article the model is outlined and exemplified with reference to respective selective alignment projects.

Source

Concepts in context: Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010. Eds.: F. Boteram, W. Gödert u. J. Hubrich

3.4474907E-4 = product of:
  0.0062054833 = sum of:
    0.0062054833 = weight(_text_:in in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062054833 = score(doc=3362,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
  0.055555556 = coord(1/18)

Abstract

This paper presents a new approach to understanding how indexing strategies, models for interoperability and retrieval paradigms interact in information systems and how this can be used to support the design and implementation of components of a semantic navigation for information retrieval systems.

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol.12

Source

Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO Conference, 23-26 February 2010 Rome, Italy. Edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzocchi

2.4630062E-4 = product of:
  0.004433411 = sum of:
    0.004433411 = weight(_text_:in in 2190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004433411 = score(doc=2190,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 2190, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2190)
  0.055555556 = coord(1/18)

Source

New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a