Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hudon, M."
  1. Hudon, M.: ¬The status of knowledge organization in library and information science master's programs (2021) 0.01
    0.0073912274 = product of:
      0.02956491 = sum of:
        0.02956491 = weight(_text_:data in 697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02956491 = score(doc=697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=697)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The content of master's programs accredited by the American Library Association was examined to assess the status of knowledge organization (KO) as a subject in current training. Data collected show that KO remains very visible in a majority of programs, mainly in the form of required and electives courses focusing on descriptive cataloging, classification, and metadata. Observed tendencies include, however, the recent elimination of the required KO course in several programs, the reality that one third of KO electives listed in course catalogs have not been scheduled in the past three years, and the fact that two-thirds of those teaching KO specialize in other areas of information science.
  2. Hudon, M.: Conceptual compatibility in controlled language tools used to index and access the content of moving image collections (2004) 0.01
    0.0063353376 = product of:
      0.02534135 = sum of:
        0.02534135 = weight(_text_:data in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02534135 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Five controlled vocabularies currently used for content representation in collections of non art moving images were examined to determine their level of conceptual compatibility. Methods borrowed from previous research in the area of indexing language compatibility were used. Quantitative data and qualitative observations allowed us to estimate more precisely and realistically the actual degree of conceptual redundancy in these indexing languages. It was found that the conceptual overlap is high enough to justify the pursuit of research and development work an a common basic indexing and access language that could be used to name objects, events, categories of persons, and relations most frequently depicted in non art moving image collections.
  3. Hudon, M.; Mas, E.S.: Structure, logic, and semantics for Web-based collections in education (2006) 0.01
    0.0063353376 = product of:
      0.02534135 = sum of:
        0.02534135 = weight(_text_:data in 4391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02534135 = score(doc=4391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 4391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4391)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Results of a project focusing on six Web-based collections in education. Our analysis of homegrown classification structures considers three dimensions. "Structure" is described through quantitative data (e.g. Number of main categories, Number of hierarchical levels, etc.). "Logic" concentrates on two aspects of the subdividing process: division principle, and type of hierarchical relation. "Semantics" relates to concepts and their representation in the form of terms. In our sample, the classification structures are hierarchical, not overly complex and not very specific. The choice, arrangement and sequence of classes are logical. Conceptual and terminological inconsistencies are due to significant gaps in conceptual coverage and lack of terminological control.
  4. Hudon, M.: Teaching classification in the 21st century (2011) 0.01
    0.0063353376 = product of:
      0.02534135 = sum of:
        0.02534135 = weight(_text_:data in 4616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02534135 = score(doc=4616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 4616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4616)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloguing and classification were at the core of the first librarian training programs In 2011, LIS educators continue to believe in the importance of teaching the basics of the classification process to all future information professionals. Information on classification instruction was collected through a survey of instructors in ALA-accredited LIS masters' programs. The survey was structured around issues touching several dimensions of any teaching endeavour, with an emphasis on the tools used to help students develop several types of skills involved in the classification process. This article presents quantitative data provided by respondents representing 31 distinct LIS masters' programs. We hope it can be used as foundation to pursue the examination of classification instruction in an ever changing information world.
  5. Green, R.; Bean, C.A.; Hudon, M.: Universality and basic level concepts (2003) 0.01
    0.0059730136 = product of:
      0.023892054 = sum of:
        0.023892054 = weight(_text_:data in 2730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023892054 = score(doc=2730,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.19762816 = fieldWeight in 2730, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2730)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examines whether a concept's hierarchical level affects the likelihood of its universality across schemes for knowledge representation and knowledge organization. Empirical data an equivalents are drawn from a bilingual thesaurus, a pair of biomedical vocabularies, and two ontologies. Conceptual equivalence across resources occurs significantly more often at the basic level than at subordinate or superordinate levels. Attempts to integrate knowledge representation or knowledge organization tools should concentrate an establishing equivalences at the basic level. 1. Rationale The degree of success attainable in the integration of multiple knowledge representation systems or knowledge organization schemes is constrained by limitations an the universality of human conceptual systems. For example, human languages do not all lexicalize the same set of concepts; nor do they structure (quasi-)equivalent concepts in the same relational patterns (Riesthuis, 2001). As a consequence, even multilingual thesauri designed from the outset from the perspective of multiple languages may routinely include situations where corresponding terms are not truly equivalent (Hudon, 1997, 2001). Intuitively, where inexactness and partialness in equivalence mappings across knowledge representation schemes and knowledge organizations schemes exist, a more difficult retrieval scenario arises than where equivalence mappings reflect full and exact conceptual matches. The question we address in this paper is whether a concept's hierarchical level af ects the likelihood of its universality/full equivalence across schemes for knowledge representation and knowledge organization. Cognitive science research has shown that one particular hierarchical level-called the basic level--enjoys a privileged status (Brown, 1958; Rosch et al., 1976). Our underlying hypothesis is that concepts at the basic level (e.g., apple, shoe, chair) are more likely to match across knowledge representation schemes and knowledge organization schemes than concepts at the superordinate (e.g., fruit, footwear, furniture) or subordinate (e.g., Granny Smith, sneaker, recliner) levels. This hypothesis is consistent with ethnobiological data showing that folk classifications of flora are more likely to agree at the basic level than at superordinate or subordinate levels (Berlin, 1992).
  6. Hudon, M.: KO and classification education in the light of Benjamin Bloom's Taxonomy of learning objectives (2014) 0.00
    0.0038850103 = product of:
      0.015540041 = sum of:
        0.015540041 = product of:
          0.031080082 = sum of:
            0.031080082 = weight(_text_:22 in 1468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031080082 = score(doc=1468,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1468, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1468)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik