-
Hudon, M.: Conceptual compatibility in controlled language tools used to index and access the content of moving image collections (2004)
0.03
0.030640597 = product of:
0.122562386 = sum of:
0.122562386 = weight(_text_:objects in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.122562386 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34784988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06544595 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Five controlled vocabularies currently used for content representation in collections of non art moving images were examined to determine their level of conceptual compatibility. Methods borrowed from previous research in the area of indexing language compatibility were used. Quantitative data and qualitative observations allowed us to estimate more precisely and realistically the actual degree of conceptual redundancy in these indexing languages. It was found that the conceptual overlap is high enough to justify the pursuit of research and development work an a common basic indexing and access language that could be used to name objects, events, categories of persons, and relations most frequently depicted in non art moving image collections.
-
Hudon, M.; Turner, J.M.; Devin, Y.: How many terms are enough? : stability and dynamism in vocabulary management for moving image collections (2000)
0.03
0.02553383 = product of:
0.10213532 = sum of:
0.10213532 = weight(_text_:objects in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10213532 = score(doc=117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34784988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06544595 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Most moving image collections have existed for less than a century, and as we enter the new millennium we observe that the organisation of these collections is still characterized by ad hoc practices. An important stream of research in this area focuses on high-level access to images using methods from library and information science, and using text to create information useful for retrieval. It has been established that common names for objects seen in the image are the key to retrieval in such collections. On a day-to-day basis, those responsible for collection management build indexing vocabularies, creating terms as necessary, and often structuring them loosely into a thesaurus. Discussions with moving image collection librarians have led us to believe that there may be an optimal number of common names a thesaurus for managing general collections of moving images should contain, and that the terms may even be the same from one thesaurus to the next. In this paper, we describe the methodology adopted for studying this question, and report preliminary results
-
Hudon, M.: KO and classification education in the light of Benjamin Bloom's Taxonomy of learning objectives (2014)
0.01
0.013300534 = product of:
0.053202137 = sum of:
0.053202137 = weight(_text_:22 in 1468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053202137 = score(doc=1468,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22918057 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06544595 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1468, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1468)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
