Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeinen%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierungs im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahmen%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierungs %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
-
Huffman, G.D.: Semi-automatic determination of citation relevancy : user evaluation (1990)
0.00
4.8590987E-4 = product of: 0.011175927 = sum of: 0.011175927 = product of: 0.022351854 = sum of: 0.022351854 = weight(_text_:22 in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.022351854 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of: 0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of: 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.023567878 = queryNorm 0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4158) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Abstract
- Online bibiographic, database searches typically produce hundreds of retrieved citations with only about 20-40% relevant to the search topic and/or problem statement. Significant amounts of time are required to categorize and select the relevant citations. A software system-SORT-AIDS/SABRE-has been developes which ranks the citations in terms of relevance. This paper presents the results of a comprehensive user evaluation of the relevance ranking procedures. Test results show that the software generated distributions approach the ideal distribution-all relevant citations at the beginning of the collection-in 22% of the cases, are 23% better than the random distribution-relevant citations distributed uniformly throughout the dcollection-on average and are poorer than the random distribution in 4% of the cae.
-
Huffman, G.D.; Vital, D.A.; Bivins, R.G.: Generating indices with lexical association methods : term uniqueness (1990)
0.00
3.5022903E-4 = product of: 0.008055268 = sum of: 0.008055268 = product of: 0.016110536 = sum of: 0.016110536 = weight(_text_:29 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.016110536 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of: 0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of: 3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218) 0.023567878 = queryNorm 0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218) 0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4152) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Date
- 23.11.1995 11:29:46