Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Huntington, P."
  • × author_ss:"Rowlands, I."
  • × author_ss:"Tenopir, C."
  1. Rowlands, I.; Nicholas, D.; Williams, P.; Huntington, P.; Fieldhouse, M.; Gunter, B.; Withey, R.; Jamali, H.R.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: ¬The Google generation : the information behaviour of the researcher of the future (2008) 0.02
    0.017012816 = product of:
      0.03402563 = sum of:
        0.03402563 = product of:
          0.051038444 = sum of:
            0.005182037 = weight(_text_:e in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005182037 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
            0.04585641 = weight(_text_:p in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04585641 = score(doc=2017,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.28089944 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  2. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Rowlands, I.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: Viewing and reading behaviour in a virtual environment : the full-text download and what can be read into it (2008) 0.01
    0.013251295 = product of:
      0.02650259 = sum of:
        0.02650259 = product of:
          0.039753884 = sum of:
            0.007328507 = weight(_text_:e in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007328507 = score(doc=1911,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
            0.032425378 = weight(_text_:p in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032425378 = score(doc=1911,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to focus on usage data in respect to full-text downloads of journal articles, which is considered an important usage (satisfaction) metric by librarians and publishers. The purpose is to evaluate the evidence regarding full-text viewing by pooling together data on the full-text viewing of tens of thousands of users studied as part of a number of investigations of e-journal databases conducted during the Virtual Scholar research programme. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the web logs of a number of electronic journal libraries including OhioLINK and ScienceDirect using Deep Log Analysis, which is a more sophisticated form of transactional log analysis. The frequency, characteristics and diversity of full-text viewing are examined. The article also features an investigation into the time spent online viewing full-text articles in order to get a clearer understanding of the significance of full-text viewing, especially in regard to reading. Findings - The main findings are that there is a great deal of variety amongst scholars in their full-text viewing habits and that a large proportion of views are very cursory in nature, although there is survey evidence to suggest that reading goes on offline. Originality/value - This is the first time that full-text viewing evidence is studied on such a large scale.
    Language
    e