Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
editor's%3a%22Neuroth%2c H.%2c A. O%c3%9Fwald%2c R. scheffel%2c S. strathmann u. K. huth%22 1
editor's%3a%22Neuroth%2c H.%2c A. O%c3%9Fwald%2c R. scheffel%2c S. strathmann u. K. hugh%22 1
editor's%3a%22Neuroth%2c H.%2c A. O%c3%9Fwald%2c R. scheffel%2c S. stratmann u. K. huth%22 1
editor's%3a%22Neuroth%2c H.%2c A. O%c3%9Fwald%2c R. scheffelt%2c S. strathmann u. K. huth%22 1
editores%3a%22Neuroth%2c H.%2c A. O%c3%9Fwald%2c R. scheffel%2c S. strathmann u. K. huth%22 1

Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Rowlands, I.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: Viewing and reading behaviour in a virtual environment : the full-text download and what can be read into it (2008) 0.00
```
0.0013806598 = product of:
  0.0075936285 = sum of:
    0.0058576106 = weight(_text_:a in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0058576106 = score(doc=1911,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
    0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017360178 = score(doc=1911,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
```
Abstract

Purpose - This article aims to focus on usage data in respect to full-text downloads of journal articles, which is considered an important usage (satisfaction) metric by librarians and publishers. The purpose is to evaluate the evidence regarding full-text viewing by pooling together data on the full-text viewing of tens of thousands of users studied as part of a number of investigations of e-journal databases conducted during the Virtual Scholar research programme. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the web logs of a number of electronic journal libraries including OhioLINK and ScienceDirect using Deep Log Analysis, which is a more sophisticated form of transactional log analysis. The frequency, characteristics and diversity of full-text viewing are examined. The article also features an investigation into the time spent online viewing full-text articles in order to get a clearer understanding of the significance of full-text viewing, especially in regard to reading. Findings - The main findings are that there is a great deal of variety amongst scholars in their full-text viewing habits and that a large proportion of views are very cursory in nature, although there is survey evidence to suggest that reading goes on offline. Originality/value - This is the first time that full-text viewing evidence is studied on such a large scale.

Source

Aslib proceedings. 60(2008) no.3, S.185-198

Type

a