-
Rowlands, I.; Nicholas, D.; Williams, P.; Huntington, P.; Fieldhouse, M.; Gunter, B.; Withey, R.; Jamali, H.R.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: ¬The Google generation : the information behaviour of the researcher of the future (2008)
0.02
0.019504793 = product of:
0.039009586 = sum of:
0.039009586 = product of:
0.058514375 = sum of:
0.005941083 = weight(_text_:e in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005941083 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07482075 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.05205393 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
0.052573293 = weight(_text_:p in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052573293 = score(doc=2017,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18716055 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.05205393 = queryNorm
0.28089944 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Huntington, P.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Tenopir, C.: Article decay in the digital environment : an analysis of usage of OhioLINK by date of publication, employing deep log methods (2006)
0.02
0.015192298 = product of:
0.030384596 = sum of:
0.030384596 = product of:
0.045576893 = sum of:
0.00840196 = weight(_text_:e in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00840196 = score(doc=214,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07482075 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.05205393 = queryNorm
0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
0.037174933 = weight(_text_:p in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037174933 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18716055 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.05205393 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The article presents the early findings of an exploratory deep log analysis of journal usage on OhioLINK, conducted as part of the MaxData project, funded by the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services. OhioLINK, the original Big Deal, provides a single digital platform of nearly 6,000 full-text journals for more than 600,000 people; for the purposes of the analysis, the raw logs were obtained from OhioLINK for the period June 2004 to December 2004. During this period approximately 1,215,000 items were viewed on campus in October 2004 and 1,894,000 items viewed off campus between June and December 2004. This article provides an analysis of the age of material that users consulted. From a methodological point of view OhioLINK offered an attractive platform to conduct age of publication usage studies because it is one of the oldest e-journal libraries and thus offered a relatively long archive and stable platform to conduct the studies. The project sought to determine whether the subject, the search approach adopted, and the type of journal item viewed (contents page, abstract, full-text article, etc.) was a factor in regard to the age of articles used.
- Language
- e
-
Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Rowlands, I.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: Viewing and reading behaviour in a virtual environment : the full-text download and what can be read into it (2008)
0.02
0.015192298 = product of:
0.030384596 = sum of:
0.030384596 = product of:
0.045576893 = sum of:
0.00840196 = weight(_text_:e in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00840196 = score(doc=1911,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07482075 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.05205393 = queryNorm
0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
0.037174933 = weight(_text_:p in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037174933 = score(doc=1911,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18716055 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.05205393 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This article aims to focus on usage data in respect to full-text downloads of journal articles, which is considered an important usage (satisfaction) metric by librarians and publishers. The purpose is to evaluate the evidence regarding full-text viewing by pooling together data on the full-text viewing of tens of thousands of users studied as part of a number of investigations of e-journal databases conducted during the Virtual Scholar research programme. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the web logs of a number of electronic journal libraries including OhioLINK and ScienceDirect using Deep Log Analysis, which is a more sophisticated form of transactional log analysis. The frequency, characteristics and diversity of full-text viewing are examined. The article also features an investigation into the time spent online viewing full-text articles in order to get a clearer understanding of the significance of full-text viewing, especially in regard to reading. Findings - The main findings are that there is a great deal of variety amongst scholars in their full-text viewing habits and that a large proportion of views are very cursory in nature, although there is survey evidence to suggest that reading goes on offline. Originality/value - This is the first time that full-text viewing evidence is studied on such a large scale.
- Language
- e
-
Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Tenopir, C.: What deep log analysis tells us about the impact of big deals : case study OhioLINK (2006)
0.01
0.014372005 = product of:
0.02874401 = sum of:
0.02874401 = product of:
0.043116014 = sum of:
0.005941083 = weight(_text_:e in 5605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005941083 = score(doc=5605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07482075 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.05205393 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 5605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5605)
0.037174933 = weight(_text_:p in 5605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037174933 = score(doc=5605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18716055 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.05205393 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 5605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5605)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
