Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Husby, O."
  1. Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006) 0.01
    0.009845134 = product of:
      0.029535402 = sum of:
        0.008834538 = weight(_text_:in in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008834538 = score(doc=2425,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
        0.020700864 = product of:
          0.04140173 = sum of:
            0.04140173 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04140173 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The FRBR model is by many considered to be an important contribution to the next generation of bibliographic catalogues, but a major challenge for the library community is how to use this model on already existing MARC-based bibliographic catalogues. This problem requires a solution for the interpretation and conversion of MARC records, and a tool for this kind of conversion is developed as a part of the Norwegian BIBSYS FRBR project. The tool is based on a systematic approach to the interpretation and conversion process and is designed to be adaptable to the rules applied in different catalogues.
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; vol.4172
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  2. Hakala, J.; Husby, O.; Koch, T.: Warwick framework and Dublin core set provide a comprehensive infrastructure for network resource description (1996) 0.00
    0.0017848461 = product of:
      0.010709076 = sum of:
        0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 6921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010709076 = score(doc=6921,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 6921, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6921)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Defines metadata, which for librarians means catalogue records for printed publications, and the need for them in document retrieval. The existence of many different sources of metadata had led to a need for simpler metadata schemes and a stadardised exchange format. The 1st Metadata Workshop, held in Dublin, Ohio, reached consensus on a simple resource description record, known as the Dublin core set, with 13 elements, which can serve to unify various models. Lists institutions intending to use it. The 2nd workshop resulted in a proposal for a container record architecture comprising more and different types of metadata than a Dublin core record. The Nordic Metadata project, outlined here, aims to improve the knowledge transfer to the Nordic countries and allow them to paricipate actively in international developments