Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Huvila, I."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Huvila, I.: Situational appropriation of information (2015) 0.03
    0.031183876 = product of:
      0.062367752 = sum of:
        0.062367752 = sum of:
          0.032648828 = weight(_text_:work in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032648828 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054837555 = queryNorm
              0.16220987 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
          0.029718926 = weight(_text_:22 in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029718926 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054837555 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose In contrast to the interest of describing and managing the social processes of knowing, information science and information and knowledge management research have put less emphasis on discussing how particular information becomes usable and how it is used in different contexts and situations. The purpose of this paper is to address this major gap, and introduce and discuss the applicability of the notion of situational appropriation of information for shedding light on this particular process in the context of daily information work practices of professionals. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on the analysis of 25 qualitative interviews of archives, library and museum professionals conducted in two Nordic countries. Findings The study presents examples of how individuals appropriate different tangible and intangible assets as information on the basis of the situation in hand. Research limitations/implications The study proposes a new conceptual tool for articulating and conducting research on the process how information becomes useful in the situation in hand. Practical implications The situational appropriation of information perspective redefines the role of information management to incorporate a comprehensive awareness of the situations when information is useful and is being used. A better understanding how information becomes useful in diverse situations helps to discern the active role of contextual and situational effects and to exploit and take them into account as a part of the management of information and knowledge processes. Originality/value In contrast to orthodoxies of information science and information and knowledge management research, the notion of situational appropriation of information represents an alternative approach to the conceptualisation of information utilisation. It helps to frame particular types of instances of information use that are not necessarily addressed within the objectivistic, information seeker or learning oriented paradigms of information and knowledge management.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  2. Huvila, I.: How a museum knows? : Structures, work roles, and infrastructures of information work (2013) 0.02
    0.024486622 = product of:
      0.048973244 = sum of:
        0.048973244 = product of:
          0.09794649 = sum of:
            0.09794649 = weight(_text_:work in 965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09794649 = score(doc=965,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.4866296 = fieldWeight in 965, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=965)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Even if knowledge is a commodity that a museum offers as Hooper-Greenhill () has argued, the mechanisms of how a museum comes to know what it mediates are not well understood. Using a case study approach, the aim of this study is to investigate what types of sources and channels, with a special emphasis on social processes and structures of information, support collaborative information work, and the emergence of knowledge in a museum environment. The empirical study was conducted using a combination of ethnographic observation of and interviews with staff members at a medium-sized museum in a Nordic country. The study shows that much of the daily information work is routinized and infrastructuralized in social information exchange and reproduction of documented information and museum collections.
  3. Huvila, I.: Information sources and perceived success in corporate finance (2010) 0.01
    0.01442888 = product of:
      0.02885776 = sum of:
        0.02885776 = product of:
          0.05771552 = sum of:
            0.05771552 = weight(_text_:work in 4096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05771552 = score(doc=4096,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.28674924 = fieldWeight in 4096, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4096)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The work of corporate finance professionals is information-intensive, despite the fact that the practices and motivations of their information preferences have been researched very little. The present study investigates perceived success and how it is related to corporate finance professionals' information source use behavior based on a Web survey of 92 Finnish corporate finance professionals. The principal finding of the statistical analysis of the data is that perceptions of work success and specific types of information sources contributing to the success are related. The correlations are complex, and very different types of information sources contribute to individual types of success, and vice versa. The findings indicate that information sources function as measures of success and serve an instrumental purpose. Besides functional relations, the correlation of the variables suggests more comprehensive success and information source use related dependencies and preferences. The findings imply that by studying existing perceptions of success, it is possible to make inferences about preferred information sources. The study also suggests that both personal and organizational perceptions of success should be taken into account when planning information services and information literacy education for corporate finance professionals to increase their effectiveness and relevance for the professionals.
  4. Huvila, I.: Affective capitalism of knowing and the society of search engine (2016) 0.01
    0.011144597 = product of:
      0.022289194 = sum of:
        0.022289194 = product of:
          0.04457839 = sum of:
            0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 3246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04457839 = score(doc=3246,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3246, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3246)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22