Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Huvila, I."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Huvila, I.: ¬The politics of boundary objects : hegemonic interventions and the making of a document (2011) 0.07
    0.0663162 = product of:
      0.2652648 = sum of:
        0.2652648 = weight(_text_:objects in 4936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2652648 = score(doc=4936,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.7878624 = fieldWeight in 4936, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4936)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Boundary objects are artifacts that reside in the interface between communities and are capable of bridging assumed and experienced differences. Bridging is not, however, necessarily a neutral or a consensual activity. With an emphasis on documents, the present article discusses the politics of boundary objects by analyzing the role of archaeological reports at boundaries between communities with conflicting interests. The analysis demonstrates and discusses the political and purposeful nature of boundary objects-how they are devices for creating and maintaining hegemonies within communities and achieving authority over other intersecting groups of people. The study uses the notion of hegemony and the discourse theory of Laclau and Mouffe (2001) to conceptualize the role of boundary objects as articulations of power and to explicate the dynamics of how the power is exercised.
  2. Huvila, I.; Dirndorfer Anderson, T.; Hourihan Jansen, E.; McKenzie, P.; Worrall, A.: Boundary objects in information science (2017) 0.04
    0.04194205 = product of:
      0.1677682 = sum of:
        0.1677682 = weight(_text_:objects in 3757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1677682 = score(doc=3757,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 3757, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3757)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Boundary objects (BOs) are abstract or physical artifacts that exist in the liminal spaces between adjacent communities of people. The theory of BOs was originally introduced by Star and Griesemer in a study on information practices at the Berkeley Museum of Vertebrate Zoology but has since been adapted in a broad range of research contexts in a large number of disciplines including the various branches of information science. The aim of this review article is to present an overview of the state-of-the-art of information science research informed by the theory of BOs, critically discuss the notion, and propose a structured overview of how the notion has been applied in the study of information.
  3. Huvila, I.: Affective capitalism of knowing and the society of search engine (2016) 0.01
    0.012873792 = product of:
      0.05149517 = sum of:
        0.05149517 = weight(_text_:22 in 3246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05149517 = score(doc=3246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3246)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  4. Huvila, I.: Situational appropriation of information (2015) 0.01
    0.008582529 = product of:
      0.034330115 = sum of:
        0.034330115 = weight(_text_:22 in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034330115 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22