-
Intner, S.S.: Struggling toward retrieval : alternatives to standard operating procedures can help librarians and the public (2003)
0.02
0.017793506 = product of:
0.08303636 = sum of:
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 5507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=5507,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5507, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5507)
0.042661484 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042661484 = score(doc=5507,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 5507, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5507)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 5507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=5507,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5507, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5507)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Starting points for cataloging and bibliographic control are assumptions that "the goal of libraries is to serve their patrons," and that documents should be dentifiable individually as well as grouped with related items in an array from which patrons can choose what they wish. But, like all human endeavors, libraries and the world around them do not stand still. Ranganathan observed that "the library is a growing organism," which prompts us to consider change a fundamental value. Years later, Marshall McLuhan observed that "the medium is the message," highlighting the power and impact of physical form on the information it contained. Despite the author's strongly held belief in the value of standards and uniformity, which has made the exchange of computerized bibliographic data possible, she suggests libraries must move beyond accepting those values unconditionally to a new position in which customization assumes a higher priority. She looks to the world of commerce to explore potentially useful new approaches to cataloging and metadata.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) nos.3/4, S.71-86
-
Crovisier, R.; Intner, S.S.: Classification for astronomy : the QB schedule of the Library of Congress Classification (1987)
0.02
0.017034415 = product of:
0.07949394 = sum of:
0.021217827 = weight(_text_:subject in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021217827 = score(doc=383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.19758089 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
0.029138058 = weight(_text_:classification in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029138058 = score(doc=383,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
0.029138058 = weight(_text_:classification in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029138058 = score(doc=383,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The overall format of the QB schedule still bears the imprint of its origin in late Victorian times and can be puzzling to those acquainted with recent ideas in the field. This article explores some of the factors behind the present appearance of the schedule, current areas of research in astronomy and how they relate to its history, and particular deficiencies in the QBs for dealing with recent research. Before the 1950s, astronomy was a very limited science, concerned mainly with optical observations of the heavens and the analysis of celestial motions and stellar interiors. More than one-fourth of all fundamental astronomical phenomena have been observed for the first time within the past 30 years. The invention of non-optical means of observation and the exploration of space greatly increased the resolving power of known objects within the solar system and gave rise to new topics. Recent research in astronomy greatly increased the scope of topics within the science, while, paradoxically, making astronomy itself a less clearly defined subject. Astronomy's debt to other sciences is seen most clearly in Library of Congress Classification's tendency to scatter astronomical topics throughout the rest of the Q schedule. Suggestions are offered for changes which could make QB a more relevant method of classifying current astronomy materials.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.3, S.23-36
-
Intner, S.S.: Problems and solutions in descriptive cataloging of microcomputer software (1985)
0.02
0.01511595 = product of:
0.0705411 = sum of:
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030166224 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Once collections of microcomputer software are established in a library, they grow like wildfire, requiring bibliographic control. Control should have been furnished by AACR2, however, Chapter 9, designed to deal with macroor minicomputer software, was difficult to apply to microcomputer software. Responding to demand from the field, a Task Force of ALA's Committee Cataloging: Description and Access devised Guidelines for Using AACR2 Chapter 9 for Cataloging Microcomputer Software, which was approved at the 1984 Midwinter Conference and is now available for purchase from RTSD. The Guidelines deal with three problems raised by application of Chapter 9 to microcomputer software: teminology; description of the physical manifestation of an item; and notes describing related hardware. A fourth problem concerns which materials are covered by the Guidelines. Each of these is explored and evaluated.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 5(1985) no.3, S.49-56
-
Intner, S.S.; Futas, E.: ¬The role and impact of Library of Congress Classification on the assessment of women's studies collections (1996)
0.01
0.007690453 = product of:
0.053833168 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=6386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=6386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Intner, S.S.: Persistent issues in cataloging education : considering the past and looking toward the future (2002)
0.01
0.00576784 = product of:
0.04037488 = sum of:
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 34(2002) nos.1/2, S.15-29
-
Intner, S.S.: ¬The floating standard : one answer to cataloging schizophrenia (1995)
0.00
0.0049761366 = product of:
0.06966591 = sum of:
0.06966591 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06966591 = score(doc=2629,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5959982 = fieldWeight in 2629, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2629)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Cataloguers should replace current notions of fixed standards with the concept of a floating standard for various aspects of bibliographic control. Currently they are trying to subscribe simultaneously to diverging norms of cataloguing and bibliographic control, working in 2 ways at once and serving opposite visions with the same output. Explains how this situation has come about and offers the possible solution of a floating bibliographic standard
-
Intner, S.S.: Scholars and media : an unmixable mess of oil and water or a perfect meld of oil and vinegar? (2001)
0.00
0.004806533 = product of:
0.03364573 = sum of:
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 5417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=5417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 5417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5417)
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 5417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=5417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 5417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5417)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 31(2001) nos.3/4, S.297-311
-
Camden, B.P.B.; Intner, S.S.; Hill, J.S.; Reynolds, R.R.; Garrison, W.A.: Reflections on cataloging leadership (2008)
0.00
0.0011622861 = product of:
0.016272005 = sum of:
0.016272005 = product of:
0.03254401 = sum of:
0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 2547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03254401 = score(doc=2547,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2547, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2547)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
