Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Intner, S.S."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Intner, S.S.: ¬The re-professionalization of cataloguing (1993) 0.00 
    5.095185E-4 = product of:
  0.008661814 = sum of:
    0.008661814 = weight(_text_:in in 7314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008661814 = score(doc=7314,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 7314, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7314)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    Traces the de-professionalization of cataloguing in the 80s and show how it is being re-professiionalized in the 90s. Describes how cataloguing has change and their need for knowledge of standards, management, research and computing
  2. Intner, S.S.: Persistent issues in cataloging education : considering the past and looking toward the future (2002) 0.00 
    4.0280976E-4 = product of:
  0.0068477658 = sum of:
    0.0068477658 = weight(_text_:in in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0068477658 = score(doc=5448,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    Describes and analyzes the following three issues which elicit strong but divergent views among cataloging faculty, students, and practitioners, and seem to have done so for as long as people have been writing about cataloging education: (1) practice versus theory in cataloging education; (2) dividing book and nonbook cataloging into separate classes versus teaching the cataloging of all materials in a single class; and (3) what setting is best for teaching cataloging-formal graduate school courses, on the job training, or continuing education offerings. Speculates on how these issues may play out in the future as cataloging education continues to evolve in the 21st century.
  3. Intner, S.S.: Problems and solutions in descriptive cataloging of microcomputer software (1985) 0.00 
    2.5475924E-4 = product of:
  0.004330907 = sum of:
    0.004330907 = weight(_text_:in in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004330907 = score(doc=348,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    Once collections of microcomputer software are established in a library, they grow like wildfire, requiring bibliographic control. Control should have been furnished by AACR2, however, Chapter 9, designed to deal with macroor minicomputer software, was difficult to apply to microcomputer software. Responding to demand from the field, a Task Force of ALA's Committee Cataloging: Description and Access devised Guidelines for Using AACR2 Chapter 9 for Cataloging Microcomputer Software, which was approved at the 1984 Midwinter Conference and is now available for purchase from RTSD. The Guidelines deal with three problems raised by application of Chapter 9 to microcomputer software: teminology; description of the physical manifestation of an item; and notes describing related hardware. A fourth problem concerns which materials are covered by the Guidelines. Each of these is explored and evaluated.
  4. Intner, S.S.: ¬The floating standard : one answer to cataloging schizophrenia (1995) 0.00 
    2.401893E-4 = product of:
  0.004083218 = sum of:
    0.004083218 = weight(_text_:in in 2629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004083218 = score(doc=2629,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 2629, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2629)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
    Abstract
    Cataloguers should replace current notions of fixed standards with the concept of a floating standard for various aspects of bibliographic control. Currently they are trying to subscribe simultaneously to diverging norms of cataloguing and bibliographic control, working in 2 ways at once and serving opposite visions with the same output. Explains how this situation has come about and offers the possible solution of a floating bibliographic standard

Years