Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Iwe, J.I."
  1. Iwe, J.I.: Linguistics and information processing : provision of syntactic and semantic consistency in the language of Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) pertaining to literature and librarianship: a comparative analysis (2001) 0.02
    0.016367726 = product of:
      0.07638272 = sum of:
        0.036007844 = weight(_text_:subject in 5427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036007844 = score(doc=5427,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.33530587 = fieldWeight in 5427, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5427)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 5427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=5427,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5427, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5427)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 5427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=5427,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5427, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5427)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    The syntactic and semantic consistency of the subject headings of Library of Congress is a matter of concern to cataloguers who must use appropriate terminologies to describe library materials undergoing processing. This paper looks at the structure of these headings by analyzing comparatively the syntactic types that make up the structures as listed in Literature and Librarianship on pages 3075 to 3085 and 3114 to 3117 respectively. Their semantic implications are also highlighted. Consistency and specificity are terms often used in criticizing LCSH. This paper examines the application of these two concepts on the structures believing that a thorough understanding of the syntactic types would help the cataloguer to determine the most appropriate and specific heading to use.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 32(2001) no.2, S.107-125
  2. Iwe, J.I.: ¬The relevance of cataloguing in library science curriculum in Cross River State of Nigeria in this technological age (2005) 0.01
    0.014107771 = product of:
      0.065836266 = sum of:
        0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02546139 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Since Library Science Education started in Nigeria about half a century ago, cataloguing has been regarded as a core subject in the curriculum. With the diversification of subjects, some core subjects were made electives. This did not affect cataloguing. Nigerian Libraries have not gone far in electronic data processing in their storage of data and information and as a result, libraries are still manual-oriented. Even though some libraries in Cross River State of Nigeria have taken their first steps towards automation, the library schools still find it necessary to continue to drill students in traditional cataloguing. The question of the relevance of cataloguing in an automated library system arises and this researcher investigates the hypothesis that cataloguing is still relevant in the library school curriculum using the descriptive survey methodology. The finding is that the manual system will continue to be used for a long time and so cataloguing will continue to be relevant even with the computer-produced catalogue.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 41(2005) no.2, S.27-51