Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Jacob, E.K."
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Jacob, E.K.: Augmenting human capabilities : classification as cognitive scaffolding (2003) 0.04
    0.04459573 = product of:
      0.08919146 = sum of:
        0.07010327 = weight(_text_:representation in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07010327 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.35583997 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
        0.019088186 = product of:
          0.057264555 = sum of:
            0.057264555 = weight(_text_:theory in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057264555 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The argument presented here seeks to extend the notion of the classification scheme as a culturally-transmitted tool by emphasizing the cognitive value of the scheme's internal patterns of relationship. lt elaborates an the use of classification as cognitive scaffolding (Jacob, 2001) and amplifies this idea through application of three constructs - constraints, selections and expectations - derived from Luhmann's (1995) theory of social systems.
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
  2. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.00
    0.0029006607 = product of:
      0.011602643 = sum of:
        0.011602643 = product of:
          0.034807928 = sum of:
            0.034807928 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034807928 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)