-
Jacob, E.K.; Priss, U.: Nontraditional indexing structures for the management of electronic resources (2001)
0.11
0.11219196 = product of:
0.26178125 = sum of:
0.03909137 = weight(_text_:world in 2253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03909137 = score(doc=2253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 2253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2253)
0.051945105 = weight(_text_:wide in 2253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051945105 = score(doc=2253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 2253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2253)
0.039854147 = weight(_text_:web in 2253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039854147 = score(doc=2253,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 2253, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2253)
0.03909137 = weight(_text_:world in 2253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03909137 = score(doc=2253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 2253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2253)
0.051945105 = weight(_text_:wide in 2253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051945105 = score(doc=2253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 2253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2253)
0.039854147 = weight(_text_:web in 2253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039854147 = score(doc=2253,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 2253, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2253)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Abstract
- Controlled vocabulary and fixed citation order are two of the mechanisms used to effect collocation in traditional bibliographic classification schemes. Analysis of the rationale underlying application of each of these mechanisms provides a framework for the development of nontraditional approaches to the organization of resources available an the World Wide Web. When supported by an extralinguistic faceted vocabulary of concepts, this framework facilitates construction and implementation of flexible, dynamic indexing systems that can be applied in the design of electronic information systems and the organization of Web-based knowledge resources.
-
Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Zhang, Z.; Foo, S.; Yan, E.; George, N.L.; Guo, L.: Perspectives on social tagging (2009)
0.11
0.10829295 = product of:
0.25268355 = sum of:
0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03350689 = score(doc=3290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
0.04452437 = weight(_text_:wide in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452437 = score(doc=3290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
0.04831052 = weight(_text_:web in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04831052 = score(doc=3290,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03350689 = score(doc=3290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
0.04452437 = weight(_text_:wide in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452437 = score(doc=3290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
0.04831052 = weight(_text_:web in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04831052 = score(doc=3290,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Abstract
- Social tagging is one of the major phenomena transforming the World Wide Web from a static platform into an actively shared information space. This paper addresses various aspects of social tagging, including different views on the nature of social tagging, how to make use of social tags, and how to bridge social tagging with other Web functionalities; it discusses the use of facets to facilitate browsing and searching of tagging data; and it presents an analogy between bibliometrics and tagometrics, arguing that established bibliometric methodologies can be applied to analyze tagging behavior on the Web. Based on the Upper Tag Ontology (UTO), a Web crawler was built to harvest tag data from Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube in September 2007. In total, 1.8 million objects, including bookmarks, photos, and videos, 3.1 million taggers, and 12.1 million tags were collected and analyzed. Some tagging patterns and variations are identified and discussed.
-
Hert, C.A.; Jacob, E.K.; Dawson, P.: ¬A usability assessment of online indexing structures in the networked environment (2000)
0.01
0.014087634 = product of:
0.09861343 = sum of:
0.049306717 = weight(_text_:web in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049306717 = score(doc=5158,freq=12.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.4416067 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
0.049306717 = weight(_text_:web in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049306717 = score(doc=5158,freq=12.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.4416067 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Usability of Web sites has become an increasingly important area of research as Web sites proliferate and problems with use are noted. Generally, aspects of Web sites that have been investigated focus on such areas as overall design and navigation. The exploratory study reported on here investigates one specific component of a Web site-the index structure. By employing index usability metrics developed by Liddy and Jörgensen (1993; Jörgensen & Liddy, 1996) and modified to accommodate a hypertext environment, the study compared the effectiveness and efficiency of 20 subjects who used one existing index (the A-Z index on the FedStats Web site at http://www.fedstats.gov) and three experimental variants to complete five researcher-generated tasks. User satisfaction with the indexes was also evaluated. The findings indicate that a hypertext index with multiple access points for each concept, all linked to the same resource, led to greater effectiveness and efficiency of retrieval on almost all measures. Satisfaction measures were more variable. The study offers insight into potential improvements in the design of Web-based indexes and provides preliminary assessment of the validity of the measures employed
-
Jacob, E.K.: ¬The everyday world of work : two approaches to the investigation of classification in context (2001)
0.01
0.013818008 = product of:
0.09672605 = sum of:
0.048363026 = weight(_text_:world in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048363026 = score(doc=4494,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.3677747 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
0.048363026 = weight(_text_:world in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048363026 = score(doc=4494,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.3677747 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- One major aspect of T.D. Wilson's research has been his insistence on situating the investigation of information behaviour within the context of its occurrence - within the everyday world of work. The significance of this approach is reviewed in light of the notion of embodied cognition that characterises the evolving theoretical episteme in cognitive science research. Embodied cognition employs complex external props such as stigmergic structures and cognitive scaffoldings to reduce the cognitive burden on the individual and to augment human problem-solving activities. The cognitive function of the classification scheme is described as exemplifying both stigmergic structures and cognitive scaffoldings. Two different but complementary approaches to the investigation of situated cognition are presented: cognition-as-scaffolding and cognition-as-infrastructure. Classification-as-scaffolding views the classification scheme as a knowledge storage device supporting and promoting cognitive economy. Classification-as-infrastructure views the classification system as a social convention that, when integrated with technological structures and organisational practices, supports knowledge management work. Both approaches are shown to build upon and extend Wilson's contention that research is most productive when it attends to the social and organisational contexts of cognitive activity by focusing on the everyday world of work.
-
Jacob, E.K.: ¬The legacy of pragmatism : implications for knowledge organization in a pluralistic universe (2000)
0.00
0.001158832 = product of:
0.016223647 = sum of:
0.016223647 = product of:
0.032447293 = sum of:
0.032447293 = weight(_text_:22 in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032447293 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Pages
- S.16-22
