Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Jacob, E.K."
  1. Hajibayova, L.; Jacob, E.K.: Investigation of levels of abstraction in user-generated tagging vocabularies : a case of wild or tamed categorization? (2014) 0.04
    0.037318155 = product of:
      0.07463631 = sum of:
        0.07463631 = sum of:
          0.024578942 = weight(_text_:5 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024578942 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.16120374 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
          0.05005737 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05005737 = score(doc=1451,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 9.2014 16:22:27
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  2. Hajibayova, L.; Jacob, E.K.: User-generated genre tags through the lens of genre theories (2014) 0.02
    0.023989938 = product of:
      0.047979876 = sum of:
        0.047979876 = sum of:
          0.019663153 = weight(_text_:5 in 1450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019663153 = score(doc=1450,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.128963 = fieldWeight in 1450, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1450)
          0.028316725 = weight(_text_:22 in 1450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028316725 = score(doc=1450,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1450, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1450)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 9.2014 13:07:19
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Jacob, E.K.: ¬The legacy of pragmatism : implications for knowledge organization in a pluralistic universe (2000) 0.01
    0.012388567 = product of:
      0.024777135 = sum of:
        0.024777135 = product of:
          0.04955427 = sum of:
            0.04955427 = weight(_text_:22 in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04955427 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.16-22
  4. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.01
    0.010618771 = product of:
      0.021237543 = sum of:
        0.021237543 = product of:
          0.042475086 = sum of:
            0.042475086 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042475086 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
  5. Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011) 0.01
    0.010618771 = product of:
      0.021237543 = sum of:
        0.021237543 = product of:
          0.042475086 = sum of:
            0.042475086 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042475086 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Jacob, E.K.; Shaw, D.: Is a picture worth a thousand words? : classification and graphic symbol systems (1996) 0.01
    0.008689968 = product of:
      0.017379936 = sum of:
        0.017379936 = product of:
          0.03475987 = sum of:
            0.03475987 = weight(_text_:5 in 5173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03475987 = score(doc=5173,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.22797652 = fieldWeight in 5173, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5173)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Icons are graphic images with functional roles in human-computer interaction. They may be used as conceptual tools to represent the organization of information or as operators affecting an activity such as printing or moving to another document. An icon may represent its referent either as a sign, a purely arbitrary relationship that must be learned by the user; as a pictograph, a visual image of the object represented, or as an ideogram, whre the referent is not a concrete entity but an attribute, a set of attributes, or an abstract concept associated with the referent. The symbolicity of an icon reflects the drgree of representativeness that obtains between an icon and its referent(s). We propose to examine symbolic languages composed of sets of icons and to assess their effectiveness as classificatory structures in terms of: 1) representation of hierarchical structure; 2) level of symbolicity; 3) contexts that promote the capability of icons to represent organization; 4) relationship between an underlying metaphorical framework and iconic representation of the organization; 5) graphic elements of effective symbolic languages; and 6) social or cultural factors related to the effectiveness of icons
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.5
  7. Tennis, J.T.; Jacob, E.K.: Toward a theory of structure in information organization frameworks (2008) 0.01
    0.008602629 = product of:
      0.017205259 = sum of:
        0.017205259 = product of:
          0.034410518 = sum of:
            0.034410518 = weight(_text_:5 in 2251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034410518 = score(doc=2251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.22568524 = fieldWeight in 2251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
  8. George, N.L.; Jacob, E.K.; Guo, L.; Hajibayova, L.; Chuttur, M.Y.: ¬A case study of tagging patterns in del.icio.us (2008) 0.01
    0.008602629 = product of:
      0.017205259 = sum of:
        0.017205259 = product of:
          0.034410518 = sum of:
            0.034410518 = weight(_text_:5 in 3360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034410518 = score(doc=3360,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.22568524 = fieldWeight in 3360, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
  9. Wildemuth, B.M.; Jacob, E.K.; Fullington, A.;; Bliek, R. de; Friedman, C.P.: ¬A detailed analysis of end-user search behaviours (1991) 0.01
    0.0061447355 = product of:
      0.012289471 = sum of:
        0.012289471 = product of:
          0.024578942 = sum of:
            0.024578942 = weight(_text_:5 in 2423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024578942 = score(doc=2423,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.16120374 = fieldWeight in 2423, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2423)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Search statements in this revision process can be viewed as a 'move' in the overall search strategy. Very little is known about how end users develop and revise their search strategies. A study was conducted to analyse the moves made in 244 data base searches conducted by 26 medical students at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Students search INQUIRER, a data base of facts and concepts in microbiology. The searches were conducted during a 3-week period in spring 1990 and were recorded by the INQUIRER system. Each search statement was categorised, using Fidel's online searching moves (S. Online review 9(1985) S.61-74) and Bates' search tactics (s. JASIS 30(1979) S.205-214). Further analyses indicated that the most common moves were Browse/Specity, Select Exhaust, Intersect, and Vary, and that selection of moves varied by student and by problem. Analysis of search tactics (combinations of moves) identified 5 common search approaches. The results of this study have implcations for future research on search behaviours, for thedesign of system interfaces and data base structures, and for the training of end users