Jacobs, M.: Criteria for evaluating alternative MEDLINE search engines (1998)
0.01
0.011511116 = product of:
0.034533348 = sum of:
0.034533348 = weight(_text_:j in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034533348 = score(doc=3264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study, undertaken at the J. Otto Lottes Health Sciences Library, Missouri University at Columbia, to derive a set of evaluation criteria to assist librarians in determining the positive and negative aspects of alternative Web sites available for searching MEDLINE via the WWW. A set of searches were used systematically to compare MEDLINE Web sites, including: Avicenna; America Online; HealthGate; PubMed; Medscape; and Physicians' Online. Focuses on the principle features of the search engines used in the sites: default fields and operators; MeSH; subheadings; stopwords protected in MeSH; truncation and stemming. Describes the group processes used to arrive at the evaluation criteria and some general conclusions which will help librarians in directing their users to a particular MEDLINE site
