Jascó, P.; Tiszai, J.: Now featuring ... movie databases : Pt.1: get the popcorn! Pt.2: the software (1995)
0.00
0.0018404414 = product of:
0.018404413 = sum of:
0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003527615 = score(doc=1789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
0.0031871665 = weight(_text_:s in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0031871665 = score(doc=1789,freq=4.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
0.011689632 = product of:
0.023379264 = sum of:
0.023379264 = weight(_text_:22 in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023379264 = score(doc=1789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(3/30)
- Abstract
- Review of film directories databases available online, on CD-ROM and diskette. Examines the content of these databases. Explains the methodology used in the study and analyzes: size and composition, database coverage, and record content looking at bibliographic identification data, cast and credit information, classification information, and evaluative information
- Source
- Database. 18(1995) no.1, S.22-32 (pt.1); no.2, S.29-39 (pt.2)
Jascó, P.; Tiszai, J.: Multimedia databases of fine arts CD-ROM and online (1996)
0.00
4.8177355E-4 = product of:
0.0072266026 = sum of:
0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 7746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004409519 = score(doc=7746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 7746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7746)
0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 7746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0028170836 = score(doc=7746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 7746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7746)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Reviews CD-ROM and online (mainly) multimedia databases of fine art. Presents the best databases and discusses the main trends in publishing fine art databases. Compares use of CD-ROM and online platforms. Explains some of the typical limitations of WWW fine art sites and highlights successful sites
- Source
- Database. 19(1996) no.6, S.12-19,22-23