Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Jemielniak, D."
  1. Jemielniak, D.; Wilamowski, M.: Cultural diversity of quality of information on Wikipedias (2017) 0.07
    0.06779422 = product of:
      0.13558844 = sum of:
        0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 3834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02059882 = score(doc=3834,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3834, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3834)
        0.114989616 = weight(_text_:standards in 3834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.114989616 = score(doc=3834,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.51174676 = fieldWeight in 3834, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3834)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the relationship between linguistic culture and the preferred standards of presenting information based on article representation in major Wikipedias. Using primary research analysis of the number of images, references, internal links, external links, words, and characters, as well as their proportions in Good and Featured articles on the eight largest Wikipedias, we discover a high diversity of approaches and format preferences, correlating with culture. We demonstrate that high-quality standards in information presentation are not globally shared and that in many aspects, the language culture's influence determines what is perceived to be proper, desirable, and exemplary for encyclopedic entries. As a result, we demonstrate that standards for encyclopedic knowledge are not globally agreed-upon and "objective" but local and very subjective.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.10, S.2460-2470
  2. Jemielniak, D.; Aibar, E.: Bridging the gap between wikipedia and academia (2016) 0.00
    0.0030039945 = product of:
      0.012015978 = sum of:
        0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 3022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012015978 = score(doc=3022,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3022, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3022)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.7, S.1773-1776
  3. Ciesielska, M.; Jemielniak, D.: Fairness in digital sharing legal professional attitudes toward digital piracy and digital commons (2022) 0.00
    0.0025748524 = product of:
      0.01029941 = sum of:
        0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01029941 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.7, S.899-912