Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Jiang, J."
  1. Wu, Z.; Li, R.; Zhou, Z.; Guo, J.; Jiang, J.; Su, X.: ¬A user sensitive subject protection approach for book search service (2020) 0.00
    0.0017738222 = product of:
      0.026607333 = sum of:
        0.026607333 = sum of:
          0.0069766995 = weight(_text_:information in 5617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0069766995 = score(doc=5617,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5617, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5617)
          0.019630633 = weight(_text_:22 in 5617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019630633 = score(doc=5617,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5617, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5617)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    In a digital library, book search is one of the most important information services. However, with the rapid development of network technologies such as cloud computing, the server-side of a digital library is becoming more and more untrusted; thus, how to prevent the disclosure of users' book query privacy is causing people's increasingly extensive concern. In this article, we propose to construct a group of plausible fake queries for each user book query to cover up the sensitive subjects behind users' queries. First, we propose a basic framework for the privacy protection in book search, which requires no change to the book search algorithm running on the server-side, and no compromise to the accuracy of book search. Second, we present a privacy protection model for book search to formulate the constraints that ideal fake queries should satisfy, that is, (i) the feature similarity, which measures the confusion effect of fake queries on users' queries, and (ii) the privacy exposure, which measures the cover-up effect of fake queries on users' sensitive subjects. Third, we discuss the algorithm implementation for the privacy model. Finally, the effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated by theoretical analysis and experimental evaluation.
    Date
    6. 1.2020 17:22:25
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.2, S.183-195
  2. Lu, W.; Ding, H.; Jiang, J.: ¬A document expansion framework for tag-based image retrieval (2018) 0.00
    0.0016375937 = product of:
      0.024563905 = sum of:
        0.024563905 = sum of:
          0.0049332716 = weight(_text_:information in 4630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0049332716 = score(doc=4630,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4630, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4630)
          0.019630633 = weight(_text_:22 in 4630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019630633 = score(doc=4630,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4630, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4630)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 70(2018) no.1, S.47-65
  3. Ni, C.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Jiang, J.: Venue-author-coupling : a measure for identifying disciplines through author communities (2013) 0.00
    4.0279995E-4 = product of:
      0.006041999 = sum of:
        0.006041999 = product of:
          0.012083998 = sum of:
            0.012083998 = weight(_text_:information in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012083998 = score(doc=607,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Conceptualizations of disciplinarity often focus on the social aspects of disciplines; that is, disciplines are defined by the set of individuals who participate in their activities and communications. However, operationalizations of disciplinarity often demarcate the boundaries of disciplines by standard classification schemes, which may be inflexible to changes in the participation profile of that discipline. To address this limitation, a metric called venue-author-coupling (VAC) is proposed and illustrated using journals from the Journal Citation Report's (JCR) library science and information science category. As JCRs are some of the most frequently used categories in bibliometric analyses, this allows for an examination of the extent to which the journals in JCR categories can be considered as proxies for disciplines. By extending the idea of bibliographic coupling, VAC identifies similarities among journals based on the similarities of their author profiles. The employment of this method using information science and library science journals provides evidence of four distinct subfields, that is, management information systems, specialized information and library science, library science-focused, and information science-focused research. The proposed VAC method provides a novel way to examine disciplinarity from the perspective of author communities.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.2, S.265-279
  4. Ling, X.; Jiang, J.; He, X.; Mei, Q.; Zhai, C.; Schatz, B.: Generating gene summaries from biomedical literature : a study of semi-structured summarization (2007) 0.00
    1.6444239E-4 = product of:
      0.0024666358 = sum of:
        0.0024666358 = product of:
          0.0049332716 = sum of:
            0.0049332716 = weight(_text_:information in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0049332716 = score(doc=946,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.6, S.1777-1791
  5. Jeng, W.; He, D.; Jiang, J.: User participation in an academic social networking service : a survey of open group users on Mendeley (2015) 0.00
    1.6444239E-4 = product of:
      0.0024666358 = sum of:
        0.0024666358 = product of:
          0.0049332716 = sum of:
            0.0049332716 = weight(_text_:information in 1815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0049332716 = score(doc=1815,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1815, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1815)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.5, S.890-904