Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Julien, H."
  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Julien, H.: ¬A content analysis of the recent information needs and uses literature (1996) 0.01 
    0.010392102 = product of:
  0.04676446 = sum of:
    0.018148692 = weight(_text_:of in 7875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018148692 = score(doc=7875,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 7875, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7875)
    0.028615767 = weight(_text_:systems in 7875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028615767 = score(doc=7875,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 7875, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7875)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    Reports the results of an investigation which used content analysis to examine the information needs and uses literature published from 1990-1994. Analyses measured the degree of interdisciplinarity evident in references cited, determined whether this literature was concerned with users' cognitive processes and with systems' design and use, and identified research methods used. Secondary analyses included journal type, author type, article type, whether the literature was grounded in theory, and user groups considered. One value of this study was the development of content analysis categories specifically applicable to the information needs and uses literature. Suggests that other areas of LIS research could be analysed according to a methods similar to that used in the study
  2. Julien, H.: Bibliographic instruction trends in Canadian academic libraries (1997) 0.01 
    0.007379255 = product of:
  0.033206645 = sum of:
    0.011975031 = weight(_text_:of in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011975031 = score(doc=2072,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
    0.021231614 = product of:
      0.042463228 = sum of:
        0.042463228 = weight(_text_:22 in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042463228 = score(doc=2072,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    Determines how bibliographic instruction in Canadian academic libraries is evolving to meet this need in the current dynamic environment. The survey data revealed that traditional content and delivery continues to be stressed. Technology is reportedly changing bibliographic instruction in positive ways, towards the teaching of critical evaluation and research strategies and incorporating more hand-on user training
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 22(1997) no.2, S.1-15
  3. Julien, H.: Constructing 'users' in library and information science (1999) 0.00 
    0.0021037988 = product of:
  0.018934188 = sum of:
    0.018934188 = weight(_text_:of in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018934188 = score(doc=731,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    This article issues a challenge to information service providers and to researchers in information management to reflect on the ways the concept of 'users' has been constructed and applied. It is argued that we need to be mindful of the conceptual parameters we establish by our notions of users and the implications of those parameters as these inform our attitudes and endeavours. Alternate labels are considered but found wanting. Thus, the author puts out a call for a worthy replacement that can enlarge the scope of our understanding and help us to reconstruct our thinking.