Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Keller, A."
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Keller, A.: Einstellung zur (automatischen) Sacherschließung in deutsch- und englischsprachigen Ländern (2015) 0.02 
    0.019697133 = product of:
  0.09848566 = sum of:
    0.027954467 = weight(_text_:und in 2571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027954467 = score(doc=2571,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.438048 = fieldWeight in 2571, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2571)
    0.035917282 = weight(_text_:der in 2571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035917282 = score(doc=2571,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.5584417 = fieldWeight in 2571, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2571)
    0.027954467 = weight(_text_:und in 2571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027954467 = score(doc=2571,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.438048 = fieldWeight in 2571, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2571)
    0.006659447 = weight(_text_:in in 2571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006659447 = score(doc=2571,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2571, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2571)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    Angesichts der Tatsache, dass die Sacherschließung in deutsch- und englischsprachigen Bibliotheken von verschiedenen Personalgruppen (Fachreferenten bzw. Katalogisierern) geleistet wird, geht die Umfrage der Frage nach, ob unterschiedliche Einstellungen gegenüber der inhaltlichen Erschließung im Allgemeinen und der automatischen Sacherschließung im Besonderen zu erkennen sind. Die Umfrage zeigt eine große Ähnlichkeit zwischen den zwei Sprachregionen: Befragte sind überzeugt vom Nutzen der Sacherschließung und möchten das gegenwärtige Qualitätsniveau aufrechterhalten, gegenüber der automatischen Sacherschließung sind sie hingegen skeptisch eingestellt. Der Beitrag präsentiert und diskutiert die Resultate der Umfrage.
  2. Keller, A.: Attitudes among German- and English-speaking librarians toward (automatic) subject indexing (2015) 0.00 
    5.0463446E-4 = product of:
  0.010092689 = sum of:
    0.010092689 = weight(_text_:in in 2629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010092689 = score(doc=2629,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 2629, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2629)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
    Abstract
    The survey described in this article investigates the attitudes of librarians in German- and English-speaking countries toward subject indexing in general, and automatic subject indexing in particular. The results show great similarity between attitudes in both language areas. Respondents agree that the current quality standards should be upheld and dismiss critical voices claiming that subject indexing has lost relevance. With regard to automatic subject indexing, respondents demonstrate considerable skepticism-both with regard to the likely timeframe and the expected quality of such systems. The author considers how this low acceptance poses a difficulty for those involved in change management.

Languages