Ashton, J.; Kent, C.: New approaches to subject indexing at the British Library (2017)
0.05
0.05336667 = product of:
0.10673334 = sum of:
0.060314562 = weight(_text_:digital in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060314562 = score(doc=5158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
0.04641878 = weight(_text_:library in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04641878 = score(doc=5158,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The constantly changing metadata landscape means that libraries need to re-think their approach to standards and subject analysis, to enable the discovery of vast areas of both print and digital content. This article presents a case study from the British Library that assesses the feasibility of adopting FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) to selectively extend the scope of subject indexing of current and legacy content, or implement FAST as a replacement for all LCSH in current cataloging workflows.
- Object
- British Library
