-
Airio, E.; Kettunen, K.: Does dictionary based bilingual retrieval work in a non-normalized index? (2009)
0.00
0.0022482995 = product of:
0.004496599 = sum of:
0.004496599 = product of:
0.008993198 = sum of:
0.008993198 = weight(_text_:s in 4224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008993198 = score(doc=4224,freq=10.0), product of:
0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05132441 = queryNorm
0.16116315 = fieldWeight in 4224, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4224)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Many operational IR indexes are non-normalized, i.e. no lemmatization or stemming techniques, etc. have been employed in indexing. This poses a challenge for dictionary-based cross-language retrieval (CLIR), because translations are mostly lemmas. In this study, we face the challenge of dictionary-based CLIR in a non-normalized index. We test two optional approaches: FCG (Frequent Case Generation) and s-gramming. The idea of FCG is to automatically generate the most frequent inflected forms for a given lemma. FCG has been tested in monolingual retrieval and has been shown to be a good method for inflected retrieval, especially for highly inflected languages. S-gramming is an approximate string matching technique (an extension of n-gramming). The language pairs in our tests were English-Finnish, English-Swedish, Swedish-Finnish and Finnish-Swedish. Both our approaches performed quite well, but the results varied depending on the language pair. S-gramming and FCG performed quite equally in all the other language pairs except Finnish-Swedish, where s-gramming outperformed FCG.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 45(2009) no.6, S.703-713
-
Kettunen, K.: Reductive and generative approaches to management of morphological variation of keywords in monolingual information retrieval : an overview (2009)
0.00
0.00100547 = product of:
0.00201094 = sum of:
0.00201094 = product of:
0.00402188 = sum of:
0.00402188 = weight(_text_:s in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00402188 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05132441 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.2, S.267-290
-
Kettunen, K.; Kunttu, T.; Järvelin, K.: To stem or lemmatize a highly inflectional language in a probabilistic IR environment? (2005)
0.00
8.3789177E-4 = product of:
0.0016757835 = sum of:
0.0016757835 = product of:
0.003351567 = sum of:
0.003351567 = weight(_text_:s in 4395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003351567 = score(doc=4395,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05132441 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4395, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4395)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.4, S.476-496
-
Järvelin, A.; Keskustalo, H.; Sormunen, E.; Saastamoinen, M.; Kettunen, K.: Information retrieval from historical newspaper collections in highly inflectional languages : a query expansion approach (2016)
0.00
8.3789177E-4 = product of:
0.0016757835 = sum of:
0.0016757835 = product of:
0.003351567 = sum of:
0.003351567 = weight(_text_:s in 3223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003351567 = score(doc=3223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05132441 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3223)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.12, S.2928-2946