Yakel, E.; Kim, J.: Adoption and diffusion of Encoded Archival Description (2005)
0.00
0.0047023837 = product of:
0.009404767 = sum of:
0.009404767 = product of:
0.018809535 = sum of:
0.018809535 = weight(_text_:m in 4812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018809535 = score(doc=4812,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4812, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4812)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article, findings from a study an the diffusion and adoption of Encoded Archival Description (EAD) within the U.S. archival community are reported. Using E. M. Rogers' (1995) theory of the diffusion of innovations as a theoretical framework, the authors surveyed 399 archives and manuscript repositories that sent participants to EAD workshops from 1993-2002. Their findings indicated that EAD diffusion and adoption are complex phenomena. While the diffusion pattern mirrored that of MAchine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), overall adoption was slow. Only 42% of the survey respondents utilized EAD in their descriptive programs. Critical factors inhibiting adoption include the small staff size of many repositories, the lack of standardization in archival descriptive practices, a multiplicity of existing archival access tools, insufficient institutional infrastructure, and difficulty in maintaining expertise.