Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

0.01717877 = product of:
  0.025768153 = sum of:
    0.005657874 = product of:
      0.02828937 = sum of:
        0.02828937 = weight(_text_:2 in 3673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02828937 = score(doc=3673,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.27011156 = fieldWeight in 3673, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3673)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.02011028 = product of:
      0.04022056 = sum of:
        0.04022056 = weight(_text_:22 in 3673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04022056 = score(doc=3673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14850806 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The node size that should be used in a hypermedia system is an important design issue. 3 interpretations of node size are identified: storage (physical size), window size (presentation size), and length (logical size). an experiment in which presentation size and text length are varied in a HyperCard application is described. The experiment involves student subjects performing a fact retrieval task from a reference handbook. No interaction is found between these 2 independent variables. Performance is significantly better for the longer texts, but no significant difference is found for the 2 different window sizes

Date

22. 5.1999 9:35:20