-
Kokabi, M.: Is the future of MARC assured? (1996)
0.00
0.0011751909 = product of:
0.018215459 = sum of:
0.014304262 = weight(_text_:20 in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014304262 = score(doc=4676,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.24296375 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
0.0039111963 = weight(_text_:e in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039111963 = score(doc=4676,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Abstract
- MARC is now more than 20 years old. It has been, and still is, criticized from different point of view. Reviews some of the positive and negative opinions on MARC, as expressed by different sectors of the profession, and studies the future of MARC in relation to technological innovations. Concludes that MARC remains a valuable means of communicating bibliographical information
- Language
- e
-
Kokabi, M.: Is the future of MARC assured? (1996)
0.00
0.0011751909 = product of:
0.018215459 = sum of:
0.014304262 = weight(_text_:20 in 6724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014304262 = score(doc=6724,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.24296375 = fieldWeight in 6724, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6724)
0.0039111963 = weight(_text_:e in 6724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039111963 = score(doc=6724,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 6724, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6724)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Abstract
- The MARC machine readable catalogue is now more than 20 years old. It has been, and still is, criticized from different points of view. Reviews some positive and negative opinions on MARC as expressed by different sectors of the profession, and considers its future in relation to technological innovations. MARC remains a valuable means of communicating bibliographical information
- Language
- e
-
Kokabi, M.: ¬The internationalization of MARC : Pt.4: UNIMARC, some formats based on it and some other MARC formats (1996)
0.00
4.0374932E-4 = product of:
0.012516229 = sum of:
0.012516229 = weight(_text_:20 in 7191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012516229 = score(doc=7191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.21259327 = fieldWeight in 7191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7191)
0.032258064 = coord(1/31)
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 12(1996) no.4, S.20-37
-
Kokabi, M.: ¬The Iranian adaptation of UNIMARC (1997)
0.00
1.2616762E-4 = product of:
0.0039111963 = sum of:
0.0039111963 = weight(_text_:e in 537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039111963 = score(doc=537,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 537, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=537)
0.032258064 = coord(1/31)
- Language
- e
