Korevaar, J.C.; Moed, H.F.: Validation of bibliometric indicators in the field of mathematics (1996)
0.01
0.0068851607 = product of:
0.017212901 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 6692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=6692,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6692, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6692)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 6692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=6692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Many mathematicians are not convinced that citation counts provide useful information in the field of mathematics. Describes a study whose aim was to obtain more insight into the significance of citation based indicators in this field. A survey was conducted to answer the question, to what extent do citation scores mirror the opinions of experts concerning the quality of a paper or journal?. Concludes that the experts' views correspond very well with bibliometric indicators based on citation counts
- Type
- a