-
Kozak, M.; Hartley, J.: Publication fees for open access journals : different disciplines-different methods (2013)
0.00
0.0036221053 = product of:
0.014488421 = sum of:
0.014488421 = product of:
0.028976843 = sum of:
0.028976843 = weight(_text_:science in 1140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028976843 = score(doc=1140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1140)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.12, S.2591-2594
-
Hartley, J.; Cabanac, G.; Kozak, M.; Hubert, G.: Research on tables and graphs in academic articles : pitfalls and promises (2015)
0.00
0.0036221053 = product of:
0.014488421 = sum of:
0.014488421 = product of:
0.028976843 = sum of:
0.028976843 = weight(_text_:science in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028976843 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.2, S.408-427
-
Kozak, M.; Iefremova, O.; Szkola, J.; Sas, D.: Do researchers provide public or institutional E-mail accounts as correspondence E-mails in scientific articles? (2015)
0.00
0.0032015191 = product of:
0.012806077 = sum of:
0.012806077 = product of:
0.025612153 = sum of:
0.025612153 = weight(_text_:science in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025612153 = score(doc=2226,freq=4.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Whether one should use a public e-mail account (e.g., Gmail, Yahoo!) or an institutional one (e.g., @wsiz.rzeszow.pl, @medicine.ox.ac.uk) as an address for correspondence is an important aspect of scientific communication. Some authors consider that public e-mail services are unprofessional and insecure, whereas others say that, in a dynamically changing working environment, public e-mail addresses allow readers to contact authors long after they have changed their workplace. To shed light on this issue, we analyzed how often authors of scientific papers provided e-mail addresses that were either public or institution based. We selected from the Web of Science database 1,000 frequently cited and 1,000 infrequently cited articles (all of the latter were noncited articles) published in 2000, 2005, and 2010, and from these we analyzed 26,937 e-mail addresses. The results showed that approximately three fourths of these addresses were institutional, but there was an increasing trend toward using public e-mail addresses over the period studied. No significant differences were found between frequently and infrequently cited papers in this respect. Further research is now needed to access the motivations and perceptions of scholars when it comes to their use of either public or institutional e-mail accounts.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.10, S.2149-2154
-
Tartanus, M.; Wnuk, A.; Kozak, M.; Hartley, J.: Graphs and prestige in agricultural journals (2013)
0.00
0.0031693424 = product of:
0.01267737 = sum of:
0.01267737 = product of:
0.02535474 = sum of:
0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 1051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02535474 = score(doc=1051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 1051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.9, S.1946-1950
-
Kozak, M.; Hartley, J.: Presenting numerical values within sentences and text tables (2012)
0.00
0.002716579 = product of:
0.010866316 = sum of:
0.010866316 = product of:
0.021732632 = sum of:
0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021732632 = score(doc=4968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.108-113
-
Kozak, M.; Iefremova, O.; Hartley, J.: Spamming in scholarly publishing : a case study (2016)
0.00
0.0022638158 = product of:
0.009055263 = sum of:
0.009055263 = product of:
0.018110527 = sum of:
0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 3058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018110527 = score(doc=3058,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 3058, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3058)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.8, S.2009-2015
