Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Kurth, M."
  1. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.07
    0.07272456 = product of:
      0.14544912 = sum of:
        0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027724843 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
        0.11772427 = sum of:
          0.07939798 = weight(_text_:management in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07939798 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04714662 = queryNorm
              0.49963182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
          0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038326293 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04714662 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  2. Peters, T.A.; Kurth, M.: Controlled and uncontrolled vocabulary subject searching in an academic library online catalog (1991) 0.01
    0.008086413 = product of:
      0.032345653 = sum of:
        0.032345653 = weight(_text_:technology in 2348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032345653 = score(doc=2348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 2348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2348)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 10(1991), S.201-211
  3. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.01
    0.006775196 = product of:
      0.027100785 = sum of:
        0.027100785 = product of:
          0.05420157 = sum of:
            0.05420157 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05420157 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04714662 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28