Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Kwasnik, B.H."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Kwasnik, B.H.: Changing perspectives on classification as a knowledge-representation process (2019) 0.01
    0.011227122 = product of:
      0.07858985 = sum of:
        0.07858985 = weight(_text_:personal in 5641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07858985 = score(doc=5641,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.39396363 = fieldWeight in 5641, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5641)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    No matter how immutable a classification may seem, it is, after all, an artifact of the human imagination and functions in a particular place and time. The author describes her personal inquiry into classification as a knowledge-representation process. She traces her changing perspectives on how classifications should be viewed and evaluated by posing the following questions: 1) How does the classification process enable or constrain knowing about something or discovering something we did not already know?; 2) In what ways might we develop classifications that enhance our ability to discover meaningful information in the information stores that form a part of our scholarly as well as our everyday lives?; and 3) How might classifications mask or distort knowledge, and how might they serve to disenfranchise people and ideas? These questions are considered through a discussion of classification structures, personal classification, the link of classification to theory, everyday working classifications, translation of classifications, cognitive aspects, browsing, genres, warrant, and the difficulties of navigating complex ontological commitments. The through thread is the importance of context, because classifications can only be seen with respect to the human endeavors that generate them.