Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"LaBarre, K."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. LaBarre, K.: Discovery and access systems for Websites and cultural heritage sites reconsidering the practical application of facets (2008) 0.02 
    0.018520145 = product of:
  0.04630036 = sum of:
    0.034049597 = weight(_text_:management in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034049597 = score(doc=2247,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
    0.012250762 = product of:
      0.036752287 = sum of:
        0.036752287 = weight(_text_:22 in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036752287 = score(doc=2247,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Facets are an increasingly common feature of contemporary access and discovery systems. These intuitively adaptable structures seem well suited for application in information architecture and the practice of knowledge management (La Barre, 2006). As browsing and searching devices, facets function equally well on e-commerce sites, digital museum portals, and online library catalogs. This paper argues that clearly articulated principles for facets and facet analysis must draw examples from current practice while building upon heritage principles m order to scaffold the development of robust and fully faceted information infrastructures.
    Date
    27.12.2008 9:50:22
  2. LaBarre, K.; Cochrane, P.A.: Facet analysis as a knowledge management tool on the Internet (2006) 0.02 
    0.017290106 = product of:
  0.043225266 = sum of:
    0.03439529 = weight(_text_:management in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03439529 = score(doc=1489,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
    0.008829977 = product of:
      0.02648993 = sum of:
        0.02648993 = weight(_text_:29 in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02648993 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In 2001, a group of information architects involved in designing websites, and knowledge management specialists involved in creating access to corporate knowledge bases appeared to have re-discovered facet analysis and faceted classification. These groups have been instrumental in creating new and different ways of handling digital content of the Internet. Some of these practitioners explicitly use the forms and language of facet analysis and faceted classification, while others seem to do so implicitly. Following a brief overview of the work and discussions on facets and faceted classification in recent years, we focus on our observations about new information resources which seem more in line with the Fourth law of Library Science ("Save the time of the reader") than most library OPACs today. These new developments on the Internet point to a partial grasp of a disciplined approach to subject access. This is where Ranganathan and Neelameghan's approach needs to be reviewed for the new audience of information system designers. A report on the work undertaken by us forms a principal part of this paper.
    Date
    29. 2.2008 15:46:43
  3. LaBarre, K.: ¬A multi faceted view : use of facet analysis in the practice of website organization and access (2006) 0.00 
    0.0048642284 = product of:
  0.02432114 = sum of:
    0.02432114 = weight(_text_:management in 257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02432114 = score(doc=257,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 257, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=257)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In 2001, information architects and knowledge management specialists charged with designing websites and access to corporate knowledge bases seemingly re-discovered a legacy form of information organization and access: faceted analytico-synthetic theory (FAST). Instrumental in creating new and different ways for people to engage with the digital content of the Web, the members of this group have clearly recognized that faceted approaches have the potential to improve access to information on the web. Some of these practitioners explicitly use the forms and language of FAST, while others seem to mimic the forms implicitly (Adkisson, 2003). The focus of this ongoing research study is two-fold. First, access and organizational structures in a stratified random sample of 200 DMOZ websites were examined for evidence of the use of FAST. Second, in the context of unstructured interviews, the understanding and use of FAST among a group of eighteen practitioners is uncovered. This is a preliminary report of the website component capture and interview phases of this research study. Future work will involve formalizing a set of feature guidelines drawn from the initial phases of this research study. Preliminary observations will be drawn from the first phase of this study.
  4. LaBarre, K.: ¬The heritage of early FC in document reference retrieval systems : 1920-1969 (2007) 0.00 
    0.0028255924 = product of:
  0.014127962 = sum of:
    0.014127962 = product of:
      0.042383887 = sum of:
        0.042383887 = weight(_text_:29 in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042383887 = score(doc=689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    28.12.2007 19:29:10
  5. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work : Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry (2004) 0.00 
    0.0024723937 = product of:
  0.012361968 = sum of:
    0.012361968 = product of:
      0.037085902 = sum of:
        0.037085902 = weight(_text_:29 in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037085902 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    29. 8.2004 9:42:14
  6. LaBarre, K.: Adventures in faceted classification: a brave new world or a world of confusion? (2004) 0.00 
    0.0024723937 = product of:
  0.012361968 = sum of:
    0.012361968 = product of:
      0.037085902 = sum of:
        0.037085902 = weight(_text_:29 in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037085902 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    29. 8.2004 9:42:50
  7. LaBarre, K.: Bliss and Ranganathan : synthesis, synchronicity our sour grapes? (2000) 0.00 
    0.0021191945 = product of:
  0.010595973 = sum of:
    0.010595973 = product of:
      0.031787917 = sum of:
        0.031787917 = weight(_text_:29 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031787917 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    29. 8.2004 9:43:23

Authors

Themes