-
Qin, J.; Lancaster, F.W.; Allen, B.: Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences (1997)
0.05
0.046337895 = sum of:
0.020986568 = product of:
0.08394627 = sum of:
0.08394627 = weight(_text_:authors in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08394627 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.025351325 = product of:
0.05070265 = sum of:
0.05070265 = weight(_text_:b in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05070265 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports on a study which collected a sample of 846 scientific research papers published in 1992 and tests 3 hypotheses on the relationship between research collaboration and interdisciplinarity. Results showed significant differences in degrees of interdisciplinarity among different levels of collaboration and among different disciplines. Collaboration contributed significantly to the degree of interdisciplinarity in some disciplines and not in others. Uses a survey that asked authors about their form of collaboration, channels of communication and use of information. The survey provides some qualitative explanation for the bibliometrics findings. Discusses the perspective of scientist-scientist interaction, scientist-information interaction and information-information interaction
-
Lancaster, F.W.: Evaluation of expert systems in information service applications (1994)
0.03
0.025351325 = product of:
0.05070265 = sum of:
0.05070265 = product of:
0.1014053 = sum of:
0.1014053 = weight(_text_:b in 8905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1014053 = score(doc=8905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 8905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- The economics of information. ASIS'94. Proc. 57th ASIS Annual Meeting, Alexandria, VA, Oct. 17-20, 1994. Ed.: B. Maxian
-
Lancaster, F.W.; Warner, A.J.: Information retrieval today (1993)
0.02
0.01810809 = product of:
0.03621618 = sum of:
0.03621618 = product of:
0.07243236 = sum of:
0.07243236 = weight(_text_:b in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07243236 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Information processing and management 30(1994) no.4, S.581-582 (L. Schamber); Journal of documentation 51(1995) no.1, S.76-77 (B. Frohmann)
-
Lancaster, F.W.: Artificial intelligence, expert systems and the digital library (1996)
0.01
0.014486472 = product of:
0.028972944 = sum of:
0.028972944 = product of:
0.05794589 = sum of:
0.05794589 = weight(_text_:b in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05794589 = score(doc=839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Based partly on chapters in a forthcoming book 'Technology and Management in Library and Information Sciences' by F.W. Lancaster and B. Sandore. Some inportant functions of a research library operating largely in a networked digital environment are illustrated. The ability of artificial intelligence and expert system technologies to contribute to these functions is discussed, in the light of a report from the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, as well as experiences with these technologies in the library world and elsewhere
-
Lancaster, F.W.; Ulvila, J.W.; Humphrey, S.M.; Smith, L.C.; Allen, B.; Herner, S.: Evaluation of interactive knowledge-based systems : overview and design for empirical testing (1996)
0.01
0.0126756625 = product of:
0.025351325 = sum of:
0.025351325 = product of:
0.05070265 = sum of:
0.05070265 = weight(_text_:b in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05070265 = score(doc=3000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Lancaster, F.W.; Connell, T.H.; Bishop, N.; McCowan, S.: Identifying barriers to effective subject access in library catalogs (1991)
0.01
0.010493284 = product of:
0.020986568 = sum of:
0.020986568 = product of:
0.08394627 = sum of:
0.08394627 = weight(_text_:authors in 2259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08394627 = score(doc=2259,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2259, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2259)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- 51 subject searches were performed in an online catalog containing about 4,5 million records. Their success was judges in terms of lists of items, known to be relevant to the various topics, compiled by subject specialists (faculty members or authors of articles in specialized encyclopedias). Many of the items known to be relevant were not retrieved, even in very broad searches that sometimes retrieved several hundred records, and very little could be done to make them retrievable within the constraints of present cataloging practice. Librarians should recognize that library catalogs, as now implemented, offer only the most primitive of subject access and should seek to develop different types of subject access tools. - Vgl auch Letter (B.H. Weinberg) in: LTRS 36(1992) S.123-124.
