Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Lancaster, F.W."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Pinto, M.; Lancaster, F.W.: Abstracts and abstracting in knowledge discovery (1999) 0.01
    0.012616104 = product of:
      0.025232209 = sum of:
        0.025232209 = product of:
          0.050464418 = sum of:
            0.050464418 = weight(_text_:m in 6233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050464418 = score(doc=6233,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 6233, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6233)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Lancaster, F.W.; Connell, T.H.; Bishop, N.; McCowan, S.: Identifying barriers to effective subject access in library catalogs (1991) 0.01
    0.010585507 = product of:
      0.021171015 = sum of:
        0.021171015 = product of:
          0.08468406 = sum of:
            0.08468406 = weight(_text_:authors in 2259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08468406 = score(doc=2259,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2259, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2259)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    51 subject searches were performed in an online catalog containing about 4,5 million records. Their success was judges in terms of lists of items, known to be relevant to the various topics, compiled by subject specialists (faculty members or authors of articles in specialized encyclopedias). Many of the items known to be relevant were not retrieved, even in very broad searches that sometimes retrieved several hundred records, and very little could be done to make them retrievable within the constraints of present cataloging practice. Librarians should recognize that library catalogs, as now implemented, offer only the most primitive of subject access and should seek to develop different types of subject access tools. - Vgl auch Letter (B.H. Weinberg) in: LTRS 36(1992) S.123-124.
  3. Qin, J.; Lancaster, F.W.; Allen, B.: Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences (1997) 0.01
    0.010585507 = product of:
      0.021171015 = sum of:
        0.021171015 = product of:
          0.08468406 = sum of:
            0.08468406 = weight(_text_:authors in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08468406 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a study which collected a sample of 846 scientific research papers published in 1992 and tests 3 hypotheses on the relationship between research collaboration and interdisciplinarity. Results showed significant differences in degrees of interdisciplinarity among different levels of collaboration and among different disciplines. Collaboration contributed significantly to the degree of interdisciplinarity in some disciplines and not in others. Uses a survey that asked authors about their form of collaboration, channels of communication and use of information. The survey provides some qualitative explanation for the bibliometrics findings. Discusses the perspective of scientist-scientist interaction, scientist-information interaction and information-information interaction
  4. Lancaster, F.W.; Warner, A.J.: Information retrieval today (1993) 0.01
    0.009011503 = product of:
      0.018023007 = sum of:
        0.018023007 = product of:
          0.036046013 = sum of:
            0.036046013 = weight(_text_:m in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036046013 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  5. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1991) 0.01
    0.006308052 = product of:
      0.012616104 = sum of:
        0.012616104 = product of:
          0.025232209 = sum of:
            0.025232209 = weight(_text_:m in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025232209 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  6. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1998) 0.01
    0.0054069017 = product of:
      0.010813803 = sum of:
        0.010813803 = product of:
          0.021627607 = sum of:
            0.021627607 = weight(_text_:m in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021627607 = score(doc=4141,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m