Search (35 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Lancaster, F.W."
  1. Lancaster, F.W.: Vocabulary control for information retrieval (1986) 0.03
    0.031525247 = product of:
      0.06305049 = sum of:
        0.06305049 = sum of:
          0.005543448 = weight(_text_:s in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005543448 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
          0.057507046 = weight(_text_:22 in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057507046 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2007 10:07:51
    Pages
    XVII,270 S
  2. Lancaster, F.W.; Connell, T.H.; Bishop, N.; McCowan, S.: Identifying barriers to effective subject access in library catalogs (1991) 0.03
    0.025520457 = sum of:
      0.021319786 = product of:
        0.085279144 = sum of:
          0.085279144 = weight(_text_:authors in 2259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.085279144 = score(doc=2259,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2259, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2259)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0042006713 = product of:
        0.008401343 = sum of:
          0.008401343 = weight(_text_:s in 2259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008401343 = score(doc=2259,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.14564252 = fieldWeight in 2259, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2259)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    51 subject searches were performed in an online catalog containing about 4,5 million records. Their success was judges in terms of lists of items, known to be relevant to the various topics, compiled by subject specialists (faculty members or authors of articles in specialized encyclopedias). Many of the items known to be relevant were not retrieved, even in very broad searches that sometimes retrieved several hundred records, and very little could be done to make them retrievable within the constraints of present cataloging practice. Librarians should recognize that library catalogs, as now implemented, offer only the most primitive of subject access and should seek to develop different types of subject access tools. - Vgl auch Letter (B.H. Weinberg) in: LTRS 36(1992) S.123-124.
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 35(1991), S.377-391
  3. Qin, J.; Lancaster, F.W.; Allen, B.: Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences (1997) 0.02
    0.023745045 = sum of:
      0.021319786 = product of:
        0.085279144 = sum of:
          0.085279144 = weight(_text_:authors in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.085279144 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0024252585 = product of:
        0.004850517 = sum of:
          0.004850517 = weight(_text_:s in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004850517 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a study which collected a sample of 846 scientific research papers published in 1992 and tests 3 hypotheses on the relationship between research collaboration and interdisciplinarity. Results showed significant differences in degrees of interdisciplinarity among different levels of collaboration and among different disciplines. Collaboration contributed significantly to the degree of interdisciplinarity in some disciplines and not in others. Uses a survey that asked authors about their form of collaboration, channels of communication and use of information. The survey provides some qualitative explanation for the bibliometrics findings. Discusses the perspective of scientist-scientist interaction, scientist-information interaction and information-information interaction
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.10, S.893-916
  4. Lancaster, F.W.; Warner, A.: Intelligent technologies in library and information service applications (2001) 0.01
    0.01414264 = sum of:
      0.012182735 = product of:
        0.04873094 = sum of:
          0.04873094 = weight(_text_:authors in 308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04873094 = score(doc=308,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 308, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=308)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0019599048 = product of:
        0.0039198096 = sum of:
          0.0039198096 = weight(_text_:s in 308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0039198096 = score(doc=308,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 308, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=308)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 53(2002) no.4, S.321-322 (I. Fourie): "A substantial literature exists on artificial intelligence (AI) and expert systems in general, as well as in Library and Information Science (LIS). Many reports are over-confident and grossly exaggerate the power and potential of artificial intelligence (AI). This is especially true of the first phase of At, and to some extent also of the third phase that is stimulated by developments surrounding the Internet. The middle phase was mostly marked by disillusionment about the potential of Al and expert systems. The confusion around the promises made by AI and the lack of operational success, leaves managers of library and information services with the dilemma of distinguishing between worthwhile research reporting on operational projects and projects that exists only on paper or in the researchers' heads. It is very difficult to sieve between the two when working through the subject literature, and to distinguish between working technology/applications and wishful thinking. This might be one reason why working systems are sometimes ignored. According to Lancaster and Warner, library managers must also look much wider than the LIS literature to note new trends; this can, however, become a daunting task. Against this background the authors report on a study conducted with the support of the Special Libraries Association's Steven I. Goldspiel Memorial Research Grant. The objective of the study was to gain sufficient familiarity with the developments in Al and related technologies to make recommendations to the information service community on what can be applied, and what to expect in the near future. The intention therefore was to focus on systems that are actually operational, and systems that hold potential for the future. Since digital libraries seems an inevitable part of our future, applications concerning them features strongly in the final recommendations. The scope of AI in Library and Information Science depends on the interpretation of the concepts artificial intelligence and expert systems. "If a system has to `behave intelligently' (e.g. make inferences or learn from its mistakes) to qualify as having AI, few such systems exist in any application. On the other hand, if one accepts that a system exhibits AI if its does things that humans need intelligence to do, many more systems would qualify" (p. 107). One example is the field of subject indexing. The same would apply if a more relaxed definition of expert systems is applied as a system that "can help the non-expert perform some task at a level closer to that of an expert, whether or not all the essential components are in place" (p. 107). Most of the AI literature relevant to libraries falls in the field of expert systems. Lancaster and Warner identify (p. 6) expert systems as " a branch of artificial intelligence, even though very few expert systems exhibit true intelligence.""
    Pages
    214 S
  5. Lancaster, F.W.; Warner, A.J.: Information retrieval today (1993) 0.00
    0.0030004794 = product of:
      0.006000959 = sum of:
        0.006000959 = product of:
          0.012001918 = sum of:
            0.012001918 = weight(_text_:s in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012001918 = score(doc=4607,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.20806074 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information processing and management 30(1994) no.4, S.581-582 (L. Schamber); Journal of documentation 51(1995) no.1, S.76-77 (B. Frohmann)
    Pages
    XVIII,341 S
  6. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1991) 0.00
    0.0029703227 = product of:
      0.0059406455 = sum of:
        0.0059406455 = product of:
          0.011881291 = sum of:
            0.011881291 = weight(_text_:s in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011881291 = score(doc=752,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.2059696 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library and information science resaerch 14(1992) no.1, S.117-118 (C. Tenopir); International classification 19(1992) no.4, S.227-228 (R. Fugmann); Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43(1992) no.6, S.456 (B.R. Boyce); Cataloging & classification quarterly 15(1992) no.1, S.245-247 (E.M. Rasmussen) Journal of academic librarianship 18(1992) no.1, S.39 (G.A. Crawford) // Winner of the 1992 ASIS best information science book award
    Pages
    XIV,328 S
  7. Lancaster, F.W.: MEDLARS : report on the evaluation of its operating effiency (1961) 0.00
    0.0029398573 = product of:
      0.0058797146 = sum of:
        0.0058797146 = product of:
          0.011759429 = sum of:
            0.011759429 = weight(_text_:s in 1931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011759429 = score(doc=1931,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 1931, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1931)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.223-246.
    Source
    American documentation. 20(1969), S.119-142
  8. Lancaster, F.W.; Zeter, M.J.; Metzler, L.: Ranganathan's influence examined bibliometrically (1992) 0.00
    0.002771724 = product of:
      0.005543448 = sum of:
        0.005543448 = product of:
          0.011086896 = sum of:
            0.011086896 = weight(_text_:s in 1379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011086896 = score(doc=1379,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1379, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Libri. 42(1992) no.3, S.268-281
  9. Lancaster, F.W.: Vocabulary control in information retrieval systems (1977) 0.00
    0.002771724 = product of:
      0.005543448 = sum of:
        0.005543448 = product of:
          0.011086896 = sum of:
            0.011086896 = weight(_text_:s in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011086896 = score(doc=1774,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 7(1977), S.1-40
  10. Lancaster, F.W.; Mills, J.: Testing indexes and index language devices : the ASLIB Cranfield project (1964) 0.00
    0.002771724 = product of:
      0.005543448 = sum of:
        0.005543448 = product of:
          0.011086896 = sum of:
            0.011086896 = weight(_text_:s in 2261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011086896 = score(doc=2261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 2261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    American documentation. 15(1964), S.4-13
  11. Lancaster, F.W.; Gillespie, C.J.: Design and evaluation of information systems (1970) 0.00
    0.002771724 = product of:
      0.005543448 = sum of:
        0.005543448 = product of:
          0.011086896 = sum of:
            0.011086896 = weight(_text_:s in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011086896 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 5(1970), S.33-70
  12. Lancaster, F.W.; Elliker, C.; Connell, T.H.: Subject analysis (1989) 0.00
    0.002771724 = product of:
      0.005543448 = sum of:
        0.005543448 = product of:
          0.011086896 = sum of:
            0.011086896 = weight(_text_:s in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011086896 = score(doc=338,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 24(1989), S.35-84
  13. Lancaster, F.W.; Li, J.: ¬The law of constant accessibility of information (1988/89) 0.00
    0.0024252585 = product of:
      0.004850517 = sum of:
        0.004850517 = product of:
          0.009701034 = sum of:
            0.009701034 = weight(_text_:s in 1565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009701034 = score(doc=1565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1565)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 15(1988/89), S.24-25
  14. Lancaster, F.W.: Evaluation of expert systems in information service applications (1994) 0.00
    0.0024252585 = product of:
      0.004850517 = sum of:
        0.004850517 = product of:
          0.009701034 = sum of:
            0.009701034 = weight(_text_:s in 8905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009701034 = score(doc=8905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 8905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S. -
  15. Lancaster, F.W.: Evaluation within the environment of an operating information service (1981) 0.00
    0.0024252585 = product of:
      0.004850517 = sum of:
        0.004850517 = product of:
          0.009701034 = sum of:
            0.009701034 = weight(_text_:s in 3150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009701034 = score(doc=3150,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 3150, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3150)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.105-127
  16. Pinto, M.; Lancaster, F.W.: Abstracts and abstracting in knowledge discovery (1999) 0.00
    0.0024252585 = product of:
      0.004850517 = sum of:
        0.004850517 = product of:
          0.009701034 = sum of:
            0.009701034 = weight(_text_:s in 6233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009701034 = score(doc=6233,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 6233, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6233)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.234-248
  17. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1998) 0.00
    0.0023241614 = product of:
      0.0046483227 = sum of:
        0.0046483227 = product of:
          0.009296645 = sum of:
            0.009296645 = weight(_text_:s in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009296645 = score(doc=4141,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.16116315 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 50(1999) no.8, S.728-730 (J.-E. Mai); Indexer 21(1999) no.3, S.148 (P.F. Booth); Managing information 6(1999) no.1, S.48 (S.T. Clarke); Electronic library 17(1999) no.3, S.193 (F. Parry)
    Pages
    XIII,412 S
  18. Lancaster, F.W.: ¬The evolution of electronic publishing (1995) 0.00
    0.0020787928 = product of:
      0.0041575856 = sum of:
        0.0041575856 = product of:
          0.008315171 = sum of:
            0.008315171 = weight(_text_:s in 2446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008315171 = score(doc=2446,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 2446, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2446)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 43(1995) no.4, S.518-527
  19. Lancaster, F.W.: Do indexing and abstracting have a future? (2003) 0.00
    0.0020787928 = product of:
      0.0041575856 = sum of:
        0.0041575856 = product of:
          0.008315171 = sum of:
            0.008315171 = weight(_text_:s in 3761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008315171 = score(doc=3761,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3761, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3761)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Anales de documentación. 6(2003), S.277-288
  20. Lancaster, F.W.: Librarians, technology and mediocrity (1993) 0.00
    0.0019599048 = product of:
      0.0039198096 = sum of:
        0.0039198096 = product of:
          0.007839619 = sum of:
            0.007839619 = weight(_text_:s in 7006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007839619 = score(doc=7006,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 7006, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7006)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.99-113
    Source
    Opportunity 2000: understanding and serving users in an electronic library; 15th Int. Symp., 12.-15.10.1992; Festschrift in honour of Herbert S. White. Ed.: A.H. Helal