Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
editor's%3a%22Neuroth%2c H.%2c A. O%c3%9Fwald%2c R. scheffel%2c S. strathmann u. K. huth%22 2
editor's%3a%22Neuroth%2c H.%2c A. O%c3%9Fwald%2c R. scheffel%2c S. strathmann u. K. hugh%22 2
editor's%3a%22Neuroth%2c H.%2c A. O%c3%9Fwald%2c R. scheffel%2c S. stratmann u. K. huth%22 2
editor's%3a%22Neuroth%2c H.%2c A. O%c3%9Fwald%2c R. scheffelt%2c S. strathmann u. K. huth%22 2
editores%3a%22Neuroth%2c H.%2c A. O%c3%9Fwald%2c R. scheffel%2c S. strathmann u. K. huth%22 2

Lange, H.R.: Creating core records for federal documents : does it make a difference? (1998) 0.00

0.0013083118 = product of:
  0.007195715 = sum of:
    0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 4632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0044180867 = score(doc=4632,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4632, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4632)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 4632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=4632,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4632, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4632)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)

Source: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 26(1998) no.3, S.87-94
Type: a

Lange, H.R.: Catalogers and workstations : a retrospective and future view (1993) 0.00

0.001302741 = product of:
  0.0071650753 = sum of:
    0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 5534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0047346503 = score(doc=5534,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5534, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5534)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 5534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=5534,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5534, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5534)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)

Abstract: Since the days of hand written catalog cards, catalogers have continually searched for, utilized, and implemented new technologies in an effort to provide more efficient and accurate access to library materials. From hand written locally produced cards to Library of Congress cards, and from typewriters to increasingly complex computerized workstations, catalogers have experimented with and adapted new methods that would permit them to focus less time on the mechanical aspects of cataloging and more on its intellectual side. Present automated workstations and the promise for tomorrow's more complex systems demand a continued adaptation and redefinition of the cataloger's role in information provision.
Source: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 16(1993) no.1, S.39-52
Type: a