Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Lange, H.R."
  1. Lange, H.R.: Speech synthesis and speech recognition : tomorrow's human-computer interface? (1993) 0.04 
    0.036036298 = product of:
  0.060060494 = sum of:
    0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 7224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02131451 = score(doc=7224,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049850095 = queryNorm
        0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 7224, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7224)
    0.019202897 = weight(_text_:information in 7224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019202897 = score(doc=7224,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049850095 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 7224, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7224)
    0.01954309 = product of:
      0.03908618 = sum of:
        0.03908618 = weight(_text_:technology in 7224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03908618 = score(doc=7224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 7224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7224)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    State of the art review of techniques which employ speech as the human-computer interface focusing on current research, implementation and potential for 2 of the speech technologies: speech synthesis, or speech output from the computer; and speech recognition, or speech input to the computer. Provides an introduction to the subject, discusses speech synthesis and speech recognition, examines library applications and looks to future use and development of these technologies
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Learned Information
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 28(1993), S.153-185
  2. Ernest, D.J.; Lange, H.R.: INFOTRAC and WILSONDISC : a comparison of new technologies (1989) 0.02 
    0.020198528 = product of:
  0.050496317 = sum of:
    0.036917817 = weight(_text_:on in 1525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036917817 = score(doc=1525,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049850095 = queryNorm
        0.33671528 = fieldWeight in 1525, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1525)
    0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 1525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013578499 = score(doc=1525,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049850095 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1525, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1525)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Describes InfoTrac (on laserdisc) and WILSONDISC (on CD-ROM), wich currently represent the only efforts to bring general periodical literature to end-users, and reports on the published reactions of librarians and users to these 2 products, as well as presenting a comparison of their search techniques and presentation of information to end-users. Reports from the field indicate that WILSONDISC is proving to be as popular with users as InfoTrac, and although the 2 systems provide different approaches to the presentation of general periodical citations, undergraduates appear able to adapt with little difficulty.
  3. Lange, H.R.: Catalogers and workstations : a retrospective and future view (1993) 0.02 
    0.01530262 = product of:
  0.03825655 = sum of:
    0.02637536 = weight(_text_:on in 5534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02637536 = score(doc=5534,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049850095 = queryNorm
        0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 5534, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5534)
    0.011881187 = weight(_text_:information in 5534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011881187 = score(doc=5534,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049850095 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5534, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5534)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Since the days of hand written catalog cards, catalogers have continually searched for, utilized, and implemented new technologies in an effort to provide more efficient and accurate access to library materials. From hand written locally produced cards to Library of Congress cards, and from typewriters to increasingly complex computerized workstations, catalogers have experimented with and adapted new methods that would permit them to focus less time on the mechanical aspects of cataloging and more on its intellectual side. Present automated workstations and the promise for tomorrow's more complex systems demand a continued adaptation and redefinition of the cataloger's role in information provision.
  4. Lange, H.R.: Creating core records for federal documents : does it make a difference? (1998) 0.01 
    0.006028654 = product of:
  0.03014327 = sum of:
    0.03014327 = weight(_text_:on in 4632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03014327 = score(doc=4632,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049850095 = queryNorm
        0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 4632, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4632)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Over the past 18 months, Colorado State University Libraries has used the Library of Congress inspired Program in Cooperative Cataloging's (PCC) core record standard when cataloguing non depository and pre-1976 federal documents. Describes the libraries' decision to use the core standard, describes the core cataloguing standard, noting especially PCC's emphasis on the importance of the cataloguer's judgement in applying the standard and comments on the libraries' use and assessment of core cataloguing

Years

Themes