Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Langridge, D.W."
  1. Langridge, D.W.: Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Methoden (1994) 0.03
    0.030297888 = product of:
      0.09089366 = sum of:
        0.010536527 = weight(_text_:in in 3923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010536527 = score(doc=3923,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.057243563 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04208298 = queryNorm
            0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 3923, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3923)
        0.040797204 = weight(_text_:zu in 3923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040797204 = score(doc=3923,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12465679 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9621663 = idf(docFreq=6214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04208298 = queryNorm
            0.32727623 = fieldWeight in 3923, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.9621663 = idf(docFreq=6214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3923)
        0.03955993 = weight(_text_:und in 3923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03955993 = score(doc=3923,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.09327133 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04208298 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 3923, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3923)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Nahezu unbeachtet in der gesamten bibliothekswissenschaftlichen Literatur blieb bislang ein Arbeitsschritt der Inhaltserschließung, obgleich er ihren Ausgangspunkt bildet und damit von grundlegender Bedeutung ist: die Analyse des Inhalts von Dokumenten. Klare Aussagen über den Inhalt und die Beschaffenheit eines Dokuments auf der Basis fundierter Kriterien treffen zu können, ist das Anliegen von Langridges, nunmehr erstmalig in deutscher Übersetzung vorliegendem Werk. Gestützt auf ein Fundament philosophisch abgeleiteter Wissensformen, zeigt Langridge anhand einer Vielzahl konkreter Beispiele Wege - aber auch Irrwege- auf, sich dem Inhalt von Dokumenten zu nähern und zu Resultaten zu gelangen, die dank objektiver Kriterien überprüfbar werden. Er wendet sich damit sowohl an Studenten dieses Fachgebiets, indem er die grundlegenden Strukturen von Wissen aufzeigt, als auch an erfahrene Praktiker, die ihre Arbeit effektiver gestalten und ihre Entscheidungen auf eine Basis stellen möchten, die persönliche Einschätzungen objektiviert.
    Classification
    AN 95550 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Sacherschließung / Verfahren
    AN 75000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Allgemeines
    AN 95100 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Referieren, Klassifizieren, Indexieren
    Content
    Inhalt: Inhaltsanalyse - Ziel und Zweck / Wissensformen / Themen / Dokumentenformen / Inhaltsverdichtung / Inhaltsverdichtung in praktischen Beispielen / Wissensstrukturen in Ordnungssystemen / Tiefenanalyse
    RVK
    AN 95550 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Sacherschließung / Verfahren
    AN 75000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Allgemeines
    AN 95100 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Referieren, Klassifizieren, Indexieren
  2. Langridge, D.W.: Classification: its kinds, systems, elements and application (1992) 0.01
    0.009330379 = product of:
      0.041986704 = sum of:
        0.009733227 = weight(_text_:in in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009733227 = score(doc=770,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.057243563 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04208298 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
        0.032253478 = product of:
          0.064506955 = sum of:
            0.064506955 = weight(_text_:22 in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064506955 = score(doc=770,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14736743 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04208298 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Date
    26. 7.2002 14:01:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of documentation 49(1993) no.1, S.68-70. (A. Maltby); Journal of librarianship and information science 1993, S.108-109 (A.G. Curwen); Herald of library science 33(1994) nos.1/2, S.85 (P.N. Kaula); Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45 (M.P. Satija)
    Series
    Topics in library and information studies
  3. Langridge, D.W.: Subject analysis : principles and procedures (1989) 0.01
    0.005445451 = product of:
      0.02450453 = sum of:
        0.008516574 = weight(_text_:in in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008516574 = score(doc=2021,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.057243563 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04208298 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
        0.015987955 = weight(_text_:und in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015987955 = score(doc=2021,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09327133 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04208298 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Subject analysis is the basis of all classifying and indexing techniques and is equally applicable to automatic and manual indexing systems. This book discusses subject analysis as an activity in its own right, independent of any indexing language. It examines the theoretical basis of subject analysis using the concepts of forms of knowledge as applicable to classification schemes.
    Footnote
    Enthält Empfehlungen zur Vorgehensweise bei der Inhaltsanalyse und diskutiert Beispiele // Eine deutsche Übersetzung ist 1994 im Saur Verlag erschienen. - Rez. in: Knowledge organization 20(1993) no.2, S.98-99. (M.P. Satija)
  4. Langridge, D.W.: Classification and indexing in the humanities (1976) 0.00
    0.0019117863 = product of:
      0.017206077 = sum of:
        0.017206077 = weight(_text_:in in 3401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017206077 = score(doc=3401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057243563 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04208298 = queryNorm
            0.30057663 = fieldWeight in 3401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3401)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
  5. Langridge, D.W.: Unified vision of library science (1992) 0.00
    0.0013382504 = product of:
      0.012044253 = sum of:
        0.012044253 = weight(_text_:in in 2689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012044253 = score(doc=2689,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.057243563 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04208298 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2689, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2689)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Points out the wholeness in the life and work of Ranganathan, stemming from the spiritual foundations of scholarship and learning preserved in Indian tradition, this essence being sometimes missed by Western readers, and his devotion to duty being the fulfilment of and not an escape from, life. Describes his art, discovery, and humor, his application of the scientific method to librarianship, his pioneering research in library science, his method of teaching, integration of theory and practice in all he does, the unification of library science by his five laws, his approach to classification,a nd the significance of the course designed by him on the universe of knowledge: development and structure. Emphasizes the essays under review highlighting the holistic approach of Indian librarianship and providing a stimulus to the frustrated and those succumbing to the routines of professional life
  6. Brown, A.G.; Langridge, D.W.; Mills, J.: Introduction to subject indexing : a programmed text (1976) 0.00
    0.0011470717 = product of:
      0.010323646 = sum of:
        0.010323646 = weight(_text_:in in 1063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010323646 = score(doc=1063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057243563 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04208298 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1063)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Content
    Vol.1: Subject analysis and practical classification.- Vol.2: UDC and chain procedure in subject cataloging
  7. Langridge, D.W.: Alternative starting points in classification (1995) 0.00
    8.111023E-4 = product of:
      0.0072999205 = sum of:
        0.0072999205 = weight(_text_:in in 5536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072999205 = score(doc=5536,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.057243563 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04208298 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 5536, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5536)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Content
    The necessity of knowledge of structure of a classification not only to compilers of systems but also to those who classify documents or search is emphasized. American and European assumptions are contrasted. The relationship of a special classification to a general classification is considered. Some differences in the construction of three general schemes are noted. The concept of a "main class" is elucidated. Alternative starting points for dividing knowledge by its forms or by phenomena are exemplified. The idea that the treatment of main classes reflects a world view is offered and supported by illustrations. Principles for determining degree of detail are presented. The case for specificity is argued. Procedures for making a science class are contrasted with those for making a humanities class.