Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rswk_00%3a%22Social media %2f massendaten %2f personenbezogene daten %2f datenschutz %2f privatheit %2f informationelles selbstbestimmungsrecht%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22Social media %2f massendaten %2f personenbezogene daten %2f datenschutz %2f privatheit %2f informationellen selbstbestimmungsrecht%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22Social media %2f massendaten %2f personenbezogene daten %2f datenschutz %2f privatheit %2f informationelles selbstbestimmungsrechts%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22Social media %2f massendaten %2f personenbezogener daten %2f datenschutz %2f privatheit %2f informationelles selbstbestimmungsrecht%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22Social media %2f massenhaften %2f personenbezogene daten %2f datenschutz %2f privatheit %2f informationelles selbstbestimmungsrecht%22 2
-
Lathrop, L.: Indexing after the millenium 2 : existing skills influence future development (1998)
0.00
0.0039070467 = product of: 0.05469865 = sum of: 0.05469865 = weight(_text_:media in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.05469865 = score(doc=4639,freq=2.0), product of: 0.13212246 = queryWeight, product of: 4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218) 0.02820796 = queryNorm 0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4639) 0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Predicts that the 21st century will offer plenty of opportunities for indexers, whether they work with electronic media of traditional back-of-the-book indexes. Emphasizes the importance of indexes in online documents due in part to their inferior readability compared to that of printed books. Full-text search technology is not a viable substitute for a good index. At the same time the market for printed books will continue to grow. Existing indexing skills will be needed to develop new processes
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.00
0.0016379097 = product of: 0.022930734 = sum of: 0.022930734 = product of: 0.045861468 = sum of: 0.045861468 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.045861468 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of: 0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of: 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.02820796 = queryNorm 0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)