Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Layne, S.S."
  1. Layne, S.S.: Artists, art historians, and visual art information (1994) 0.04
    0.040386416 = product of:
      0.060579624 = sum of:
        0.01812039 = weight(_text_:in in 1027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01812039 = score(doc=1027,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 1027, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1027)
        0.042459235 = product of:
          0.08491847 = sum of:
            0.08491847 = weight(_text_:22 in 1027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08491847 = score(doc=1027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses how artists, particularly in the applied arts, and art historians, look for and use information. Emphasizes the need for visual as well as tecxtual information in art
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1994, no.47, S.22-36
  2. Miller, D.; Olson, T.; Layne, S.S.: Promoting research and best practices in subject reference structures : a decade of work by the subject analysis committee (2005) 0.02
    0.021550696 = product of:
      0.032326043 = sum of:
        0.011096427 = weight(_text_:in in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011096427 = score(doc=123,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
        0.021229617 = product of:
          0.042459235 = sum of:
            0.042459235 = weight(_text_:22 in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042459235 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18290302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In 2004, the ALCTS (Association for Library Collections & Technical Services) Cataloging and Classification Section Subject Analysis Committee (SAC) produced the report Recommendations for Providing Access to, Display of, Navigation within and among, and Modifications of Existing Practice Regarding Subject Reference Structures in Automated Systems. This document is one important outcome of nearly ten years' work by three SAC (Subject Analysis Committee) subcommittees investigating the theoretical, pragmatic, and political dimensions of improving subject access through better use of reference structure data. The work of those subcommittees is reviewed and their recommendations are described and summarized. Potential future effects of the report are discussed, as is a snapshot view of several major automation systems' current compliance with the recommendations.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Layne, S.S.: Some issues in the indexing of images (1994) 0.02
    0.016389651 = product of:
      0.024584476 = sum of:
        0.010570227 = weight(_text_:in in 8261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010570227 = score(doc=8261,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 8261, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8261)
        0.014014249 = product of:
          0.028028497 = sum of:
            0.028028497 = weight(_text_:science in 8261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028028497 = score(doc=8261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052230705 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 8261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses some of the intellectual issues involved in the indexing of visual or pictorial images, postulating that the indexing of images should provide access to images based on the attributes of those images, and provide access to useful groupings of images, not simply access to individual images. The attributes of images can be divided into four categories: 'Biographical' attributes, 'Subject' attributes, 'Exemplified' attributes and 'Relationship' attributes. When creating grouping of images, it is important to consider the following issues or questions: when should the grouping occur? What are the groupings based on? What level of detail is necessary? and what grouings will be useful?. More research is needed into the ways images are sought and the reasons that they are useful
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.8, S.583-588
  4. Layne, S.S.: Miss Elizabeth (Betty) Baughman (1998) 0.01
    0.0050334414 = product of:
      0.015100324 = sum of:
        0.015100324 = weight(_text_:in in 2716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015100324 = score(doc=2716,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 2716, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2716)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Articles included in an issue devoted to part 1 of a 2 part series celebrating people who have been leaders in the field of cataloguing and classification
  5. Woodley, M.S.; Layne, S.S.: ¬An interview with Sara Shatford Layne (2003) 0.00
    0.0040267534 = product of:
      0.01208026 = sum of:
        0.01208026 = weight(_text_:in in 5477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01208026 = score(doc=5477,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5477, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5477)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Sara Shatford Layne discusses her career in cataloging and her work in several areas of cataloging theory. Topics covered include the intellectual attractions of cataloging, seriality and the serial "work," development of revised Chapter 12 of AACR, subject access to visual images, OPAC design, and cataloging education.
  6. Layne, S.S.: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (2009) 0.00
    0.0025167207 = product of:
      0.007550162 = sum of:
        0.007550162 = weight(_text_:in in 3776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007550162 = score(doc=3776,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.10626988 = fieldWeight in 3776, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3776)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), is the title of a report prepared by an IFLA study group and published in 1998. The term "FRBR" is used to refer both to the report and to the conceptual model described in that report. The FRBR report defined the user tasks find, identify, select, and obtain; developed the FRBR conceptual model to describe bibliographic data; and mapped the user tasks to the bibliographic data. The FRBR model is based on entity-relationship modeling and identifies three groups of entities. Group 1, consisting of work, expression, manifestation, and item is the most fully developed. Group 2 consists of persons and corporate bodies. Group 3 consists of entities that can serve as subjects but that belong to neither Group 1 nor Group 2. The FRBR model has generated both theoretical discussion and applied research, and has affected the modeling of authority data, the development of cataloging rules, and the design of systems for the display of bibliographic data. Although there are unresolved issues associated with the FRBR model it still provides hope for a useful organization of the bibliographic universe.
  7. Kincy, C.P.; Layne, S.S.: Making the move to RDA : a self-study primer for catalogers (2014) 0.00
    0.0024914262 = product of:
      0.0074742786 = sum of:
        0.0074742786 = weight(_text_:in in 2012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0074742786 = score(doc=2012,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052230705 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 2012, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2012)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Volltext unter: http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=568636. Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 53(2015) no.2, S.252-255 (Robert Rendall)