Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Lazinger, S.S."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Lazinger, S.S.; Peritz, B.C.: Reader use of a nationwide research library network : local OPAC vs. remote files (1991) 0.05 
    0.04752116 = product of:
  0.09504232 = sum of:
    0.09504232 = sum of:
      0.052698605 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052698605 = score(doc=3013,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052088603 = queryNorm
          0.30797386 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
      0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042343717 = score(doc=3013,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052088603 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The primary objective of the present study was to exmine whether readers conducting bibliographic searches in ALEPH - Israel's research library network - tend to search only within the OPAC of the library within which they are working or whether they access the remote OPACs of other libraries. The ALEPH network has a dezentralized database. Therefore, it was possible to examine this question because each library has its own access code and each database can be searched separately. The data were collected by means of a one-page questionnaire lefr beside each terminal in the library of the Graduate School of Library and Archive Studies of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem during an entire academic years. results of analysis of the data collected in this survey are presented in 6 tables
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:06:18
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 10(1991), S.192-200
  2. Lazinger, S.S.: To merge or not to merge : Israel's Union List of Monographs in the context of merging algorithms (1994) 0.05 
    0.04643757 = product of:
  0.09287514 = sum of:
    0.09287514 = sum of:
      0.043474134 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043474134 = score(doc=3100,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052088603 = queryNorm
          0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
      0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049401004 = score(doc=3100,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052088603 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:00:54
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 13(1994) no.3, S.213-219
  3. Meir, D.D.; Lazinger, S.S.: Measuring the performance of a merging algorithm : mismatches, missed-matches, and overlap in Israel's union list (1998) 0.01 
    0.009315886 = product of:
  0.018631771 = sum of:
    0.018631771 = product of:
      0.037263542 = sum of:
        0.037263542 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037263542 = score(doc=3382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 3382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3382)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 17(1998) no.3, S.116-123
  4. Shoham, S.; Lazinger, S.S.: ¬The no-main-entry principle and the automated catalog (1991) 0.01 
    0.009315886 = product of:
  0.018631771 = sum of:
    0.018631771 = product of:
      0.037263542 = sum of:
        0.037263542 = weight(_text_:libraries in 507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037263542 = score(doc=507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052088603 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=507)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The No-Main-Entry Principle and the accompanying Description-Idependent System of cataloging, described in a 1989 article by Takawashi, Shihota and Oshiro, is analyzed in relation to the online catalog. The development of the main entry concept, from the time of the single entry catalog to the advent of the automated catalog is described. The relation between the available technologies of the time and the main entry concept is explored. Although the necessity for a main entry, or full cataloging record, in a single entry catalog is acknowledged, it is suggested that in an automated catalog it is no longer relevant. A recommendation that libraries with online catalogs explore the possibilities of cataloging according to the no-main-entry principle is accompanied by a stateement of the advantage of such a system and suggestions for implementing it.

Authors

Themes