Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.014659695 = product of:
  0.043979086 = sum of:
    0.013330294 = weight(_text_:in in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013330294 = score(doc=360,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06335582 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046576444 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
    0.030648792 = weight(_text_:und in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030648792 = score(doc=360,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10323049 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046576444 = queryNorm
        0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Es ist naheliegend, einen Band zur Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung damit zu beginnen, den Begriff Qualität als solchen zu reflektieren. Wenn wir Qualität gemäß der ISO-Norm 9000:2015-1 definieren als "Grad, in dem ein Satz inhärenter Merkmale eines Objekts Anforderungen erfüllt", was sind dann die Qualitätsanforderungen an die Inhaltserschließung? Auf diese Frage gibt es zweifellos keine eindeutige und allgemeingültige Antwort - zumindest war das das Ergebnis der Diskussion unter den Herausgeber:innen dieses Bandes. Dementsprechend beleuchten wir die Frage im Folgenden aus vier unterschiedlichen Perspektiven: zunächst aus einer eher idealistischen, im Berufsethos verankerten, dann aus einer rein fachlichen und schließlich aus einer praktischen Perspektive. Die vierte, die deskriptive bzw. historische, geht als eigener Aufsatz von Andreas Ledl in den Band ein.

Series

Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70

Source

Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a

0.0121882735 = product of:
  0.03656482 = sum of:
    0.015115134 = weight(_text_:in in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015115134 = score(doc=362,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06335582 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046576444 = queryNorm
        0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
    0.021449687 = weight(_text_:und in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021449687 = score(doc=362,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10323049 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046576444 = queryNorm
        0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

In diesem Beitrag sollen Aspekte des Diskurses eines halben Jahrhunderts über die Qualität von Sacherschließung im deutschsprachigen Raum anhand ausgewählter Publikationen skizziert werden. Einschlusskriterium bei der Selektion der Texte war, dass der Begriff Qualität unmittelbar auf Inhalts- bzw. Sacherschließung bezogen ist, also nicht zwischen den Zeilen herausgelesen werden muss. Der subjektive Abriss erhebt keinen Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit. Als erstes fällt auf, dass das Thema Qualität der Inhaltserschließung in den 1970er Jahren weit weniger häufig diskutiert wird als in den Jahrzehnten danach. Dies ist dem Umstand geschuldet, dass sich seit dem Zweiten Weltkrieg in punkto Sacherschließung nur wenig getan hat. Die Bibliotheken kooperieren nicht untereinander und nehmen bei der Inhaltserschließung vor allem ihre eigenen Bestände in den Blick -Qualität ist daher höchstens ein internes Thema. Was qualitätvoll sein muss, ist der universelle Bestand an sich.

Series

Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70

Source

Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a

0.0021989285 = product of:
  0.013193571 = sum of:
    0.013193571 = weight(_text_:in in 4804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013193571 = score(doc=4804,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06335582 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046576444 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 4804, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4804)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol.16

Source

Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira

0.0021291035 = product of:
  0.01277462 = sum of:
    0.01277462 = weight(_text_:in in 2038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01277462 = score(doc=2038,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06335582 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046576444 = queryNorm
        0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 2038, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2038)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

The BAsel Register of Thesauri, Ontologies & Classifications (BARTOC, http://bartoc.org) is a bibliographic database aiming to record metadata of as many Knowledge Organization Systems as possible. It has a facetted, responsive web design search interface in 20 EU languages. With more than 1'300 interdisciplinary items in 77 languages, BARTOC is the largest database of its kind, multilingual both by content and features, and it is still growing. This being said, the demonstration of BARTOC would be suitable for topic nr. 10 [Multilingual and Interdisciplinary KOS applications and tools]. BARTOC has been developed by the University Library of Basel, Switzerland. It is rooted in the tradition of library and information science of collecting bibliographic records of controlled and structured vocabularies, yet in a more contemporary manner. BARTOC is based on the open source content management system Drupal 7.

Content

Vortrag anlässlich: 14th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, TPDL 2015 Conference in Poznan, Poland, Friday 18th September 2015. Vgl. auch: http://bartoc.org/.

0.0019240624 = product of:
  0.011544374 = sum of:
    0.011544374 = weight(_text_:in in 2975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011544374 = score(doc=2975,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06335582 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046576444 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 2975, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2975)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

This paper introduces a cooperation between the Basel Register of Thesauri, Ontologies & Classifications (BARTOC) and project coli-conc to provide information about Knowledge Organization Systems, which "encompass all types of schemes for organizing information and promoting knowledge management", in uniform form. The result is a proper metadata scheme, the JSKOS data format, and an API to connect and access connecting terminology registries so terminologies can be discovered and explored at one place.

Content

Vortrag, "TKE 2016 - 12th International Conference on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering", 2016. The paper has been accepted by TKE 2016 - 12th International Conference on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering (see http://sf.cbs.dk/gtw/conferences_terminology_and_knowledge_engineering/tke_2016_copenhagen) and will be published in the conference proceedings.