Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

0.05683048 = product of:
  0.11366096 = sum of:
    0.010511758 = weight(_text_:information in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010511758 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09032827 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051455088 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
    0.103149205 = sum of:
      0.06132048 = weight(_text_:organization in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06132048 = score(doc=1416,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18345574 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051455088 = queryNorm
          0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
      0.041828725 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041828725 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18018696 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051455088 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This paper reports on the preliminary findings of a study that explores mental associations made by novices viewing art images. In a controlled environment, 20 Taiwanese college students responded to the question "What does the painting remind you of?" after viewing each digitized image of 15 oil paintings by a famous Taiwanese artist. Rather than focusing on the representation or interpretation of art, the study attempted to solicit information about how non-experts are stimulated by art. This paper reports on the analysis of participant responses to three of the images, and describes a12-type taxonomy of association emerged from the analysis. While 9 of the types are derived and adapted from facets in the Art & Architecture Thesaurus, three new types - Artistic Influence Association, Reactive Association, and Prototype Association - are discovered. The conclusion briefly discusses both the significance of the findings and the implications for future research.

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.025841877 = product of:
  0.051683754 = sum of:
    0.021023516 = weight(_text_:information in 2698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021023516 = score(doc=2698,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09032827 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051455088 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2698, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2698)
    0.03066024 = product of:
      0.06132048 = sum of:
        0.06132048 = weight(_text_:organization in 2698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06132048 = score(doc=2698,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18345574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051455088 = queryNorm
            0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 2698, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2698)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Reports a preliminary analysis of organizational schemes applied by academic libraries worldwide to arrange their electronic resources an their Web-based information gateways. The unsystematic sample consists of 41 academic libraries in 10 countries representing 4 languages, Chinese, English, German, and Spanish. The study reveals a widely accepted practice in applying 6 simplistic methods to organizing online information: by resource type, alphabetical by title, alphabetical by subject (mostly discipline and genre), by vendor/publisher, by broad classification, and random. In addition, it notes a marked difference between libraries in the English-speaking world and those in other countries in that the former present significantly more systematic characteristics.

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol.8

Source

Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas

Theme

Information Gateway

0.025841877 = product of:
  0.051683754 = sum of:
    0.021023516 = weight(_text_:information in 3991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021023516 = score(doc=3991,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09032827 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051455088 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3991, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3991)
    0.03066024 = product of:
      0.06132048 = sum of:
        0.06132048 = weight(_text_:organization in 3991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06132048 = score(doc=3991,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18345574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051455088 = queryNorm
            0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 3991, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3991)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Although researchers have theorized the critical importance of classification in the organization of information, the classification approach seems to have given way to the alphabetical subject approach in retrieval tools widely used in libraries, and research an how users utilize classification or classification-like arrangements in information seeking has been scant. To better understand whether searchers consider classificatory structures a viable alternative to information retrieval, this article reports an a study of how 24 library and information science students used Yahoo! directories, a popular search service resembling classification, in completing an assigned simple task. Several issues emerged from the students' reporting of their search process and a comparison between hierarchical navigation and keyword searching: citation order of facets, precision vs. recall, and other factors influencing searchers' successes and preferences. The latter included search expertise, knowledge of the discipline, and time required to complete the search. Without a definitive conclusion, we suggest a number of directoons for further research.

Source

Knowledge organization. 32(2005) no.1, S.10-24

0.022763055 = product of:
  0.04552611 = sum of:
    0.01486587 = weight(_text_:information in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01486587 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09032827 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051455088 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
    0.03066024 = product of:
      0.06132048 = sum of:
        0.06132048 = weight(_text_:organization in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06132048 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18345574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051455088 = queryNorm
            0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The paper reports an a study that examined the parameters provided in the online catalogue of a university library for defining its collection and subcollections that would facilitate information seeking. Taking a user-centered approach, the study asked two questions: (1) Does the online catalogue provide a useful collection structure for the users? (2) Are there any parameters that are considered useful by the users for structuring the collection absent from the online catalogue? The online catalogue was found to adequately provide only a few of the user collection and subcollection parameters, including user privilege and document type. However, it lacked most of the important parameters required by the users, including catalogue representation of the entire collection and disciplinary categories for defining subject subcollections.

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9

Source

Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine

0.014453375 = product of:
  0.0578135 = sum of:
    0.0578135 = product of:
      0.115627 = sum of:
        0.115627 = weight(_text_:organization in 4893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.115627 = score(doc=4893,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18345574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051455088 = queryNorm
            0.6302719 = fieldWeight in 4893, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4893)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol.15

Source

Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei

0.00894257 = product of:
  0.03577028 = sum of:
    0.03577028 = product of:
      0.07154056 = sum of:
        0.07154056 = weight(_text_:organization in 239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07154056 = score(doc=239,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18345574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051455088 = queryNorm
            0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 239, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol.10

Source

Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch

0.00766506 = product of:
  0.03066024 = sum of:
    0.03066024 = product of:
      0.06132048 = sum of:
        0.06132048 = weight(_text_:organization in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06132048 = score(doc=2273,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18345574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051455088 = queryNorm
            0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol.11

Source

Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis

0.0054200157 = product of:
  0.021680063 = sum of:
    0.021680063 = product of:
      0.043360125 = sum of:
        0.043360125 = weight(_text_:organization in 4295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043360125 = score(doc=4295,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18345574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051455088 = queryNorm
            0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 4295, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4295)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Knowledge organization. 38(2011) no.1, S.25-42

0.0017519597 = product of:
  0.0070078387 = sum of:
    0.0070078387 = weight(_text_:information in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0070078387 = score(doc=2321,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09032827 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051455088 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss and shed light on the following questions: What is an author? Is it a person who writes? Or, is it, in information, an iconic taxonomic designation (some might say a "classification") for a group of writings that are recognized by the public in some particular way? What does it mean when a search engine, or catalog, asks a user to enter the name of an author? And how does that accord with the manner in which the data have been entered in association with the names of the entities identified with the concept of authorship? Design/methodology/approach - The authors use several cases as bases of phenomenological discourse analysis, combining as best the authors can components of eidetic bracketing (a Husserlian technique for isolating noetic reduction) with Foucauldian discourse analysis. The two approaches are not sympathetic or together cogent, so the authors present them instead as alternative explanations alongside empirical evidence. In this way the authors are able to isolate components of iconic "authorship" and then subsequently engage them in discourse. Findings - An "author" is an iconic name associated with a class of works. An "author" is a role in public discourse between a set of works and the culture that consumes them. An "author" is a role in cultural sublimation, or a power broker in deabstemiation. An "author" is last, if ever, a person responsible for the intellectual content of a published work. The library catalog's attribution of "author" is at odds with the Foucauldian discursive comprehension of the role of an "author." Originality/value - One of the main assets of this paper is the combination of Foucauldian discourse analysis with phenomenological analysis for the study of the "author." The authors turned to Foucauldian discourse analysis to discover the loci of power in the interactions of the public with the named authorial entities. The authors also looked to phenomenological analysis to consider the lived experience of users who encounter the same named authorial entities. The study of the "author" in this combined way facilitated the revelation of new aspects of the role of authorship in search engines and library catalogs.