-
Kang, I.-S.; Na, S.-H.; Lee, S.; Jung, H.; Kim, P.; Sung, W.-K.; Lee, J.-H.: On co-authorship for author disambiguation (2009)
0.05
0.049952157 = sum of:
0.025381705 = product of:
0.10152682 = sum of:
0.10152682 = weight(_text_:authors in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10152682 = score(doc=2453,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05210816 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.024570452 = product of:
0.049140904 = sum of:
0.049140904 = weight(_text_:i in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049140904 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.05210816 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Author name disambiguation deals with clustering the same-name authors into different individuals. To attack the problem, many studies have employed a variety of disambiguation features such as coauthors, titles of papers/publications, topics of articles, emails/affiliations, etc. Among these, co-authorship is the most easily accessible and influential, since inter-person acquaintances represented by co-authorship could discriminate the identities of authors more clearly than other features. This study attempts to explore the net effects of co-authorship on author clustering in bibliographic data. First, to handle the shortage of explicit coauthors listed in known citations, a web-assisted technique of acquiring implicit coauthors of the target author to be disambiguated is proposed. Then, a coauthor disambiguation hypothesis that the identity of an author can be determined by his/her coauthors is examined and confirmed through a variety of author disambiguation experiments.
-
Na, S.-H.; Kang, I.-S.; Roh, J.-E.; Lee, J.-H.: ¬An empirical study of query expansion and cluster-based retrieval in language modeling approach (2007)
0.01
0.014332764 = product of:
0.028665528 = sum of:
0.028665528 = product of:
0.057331055 = sum of:
0.057331055 = weight(_text_:i in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057331055 = score(doc=906,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.05210816 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Na, S.-H.; Kang, I.-S.; Lee, J.-H.: Adaptive document clustering based on query-based similarity (2007)
0.01
0.012285226 = product of:
0.024570452 = sum of:
0.024570452 = product of:
0.049140904 = sum of:
0.049140904 = weight(_text_:i in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049140904 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.05210816 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kang, I.-S.; Na, S.-H.; Kim, J.; Lee, J.-H.: Cluster-based patent retrieval (2007)
0.01
0.012285226 = product of:
0.024570452 = sum of:
0.024570452 = product of:
0.049140904 = sum of:
0.049140904 = weight(_text_:i in 930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049140904 = score(doc=930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.05210816 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=930)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Jett, J.; Humpal, N.; Charles, V.; Lee, J.-H.: What is a series, really? (2017)
0.01
0.010575711 = product of:
0.021151422 = sum of:
0.021151422 = product of:
0.08460569 = sum of:
0.08460569 = weight(_text_:authors in 3416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08460569 = score(doc=3416,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05210816 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 3416, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3416)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- As library user needs become increasingly nuanced and technical, the lack of adequate metadata to meet user needs is creating a broadening gulf between library catalog functionality and library user expectations. One of the areas where the dearth of metadata is forming barriers is the idea of "series." While traditional bibliographic definitions of "series" have been adequate to meet user needs in the past, their inability to fully encompass more complex media types beyond simple text is forming barriers against the accessibility of non-traditional formats such as video games, artistic works, datasets, and similar information resources. This article explores the concept of "series" both as it is employed in bibliographic cataloging settings and encompasses actual works. The authors review the term's usage and general meaning across a large variety of media types beyond traditional journals and monographs. Examples are developed as counter-examples to the adequacy of the traditional bibliographic view of series. The authors conclude that the library and information science community as a whole needs to engage in a broader discussion of series cataloging practices and suggest alternate accounts of series that view them as aggregations (like collections) or as containers for intellectual content.
-
Na, S.-H.; Kang, I.-S.; Lee, J.-H.: Parsimonious translation models for information retrieval (2007)
0.01
0.010237687 = product of:
0.020475375 = sum of:
0.020475375 = product of:
0.04095075 = sum of:
0.04095075 = weight(_text_:i in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04095075 = score(doc=898,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.05210816 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
