-
Lee, W.-C.: Conflicts of semantic warrants in cataloging practices (2017)
0.11
0.10819927 = product of:
0.1442657 = sum of:
0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008582841 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
0.1106488 = weight(_text_:standards in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1106488 = score(doc=3871,freq=8.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.49242854 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
0.025034059 = product of:
0.050068118 = sum of:
0.050068118 = weight(_text_:organization in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050068118 = score(doc=3871,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.27854347 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- This study presents preliminary themes surfaced from an ongoing ethnographic study. The research question is: how and where do cultures influence the cataloging practices of using U.S. standards to catalog Chinese materials? The author applies warrant as a lens for evaluating knowledge representation systems, and extends the application from examining classificatory decisions to cataloging decisions. Semantic warrant as a conceptual tool allows us to recognize and name the various rationales behind cataloging decisions, grants us explanatory power, and the language to "visualize" and reflect on the conflicting priorities in cataloging practices. Through participatory observation, the author recorded the cataloging practices of two Chinese catalogers working on the same cataloging project. One of the catalogers is U.S. trained, and another cataloger is a professor of Library and Information Science from China, who is also a subject expert and a cataloger of Chinese special collections. The study shows how the catalogers describe Chinese special collections using many U.S. cataloging and classification standards but from different approaches. The author presents particular cases derived from the fieldwork, with an emphasis on the many layers presented by cultures, principles, standards, and practices of different scope, each of which may represent conflicting warrants. From this, it is made clear that the conflicts of warrants influence cataloging practice. We may view the conflicting warrants as an interpretation of the tension between different semantic warrants and the globalization and localization of cataloging standards.
- Content
- Beitrag bei: NASKO 2017: Visualizing Knowledge Organization: Bringing Focus to Abstract Realities. The sixth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO 2017), June 15-16, 2017, in Champaign, IL, USA.
-
Lee, W.-C.: Culture and classification : an introduction to thinking about ethical issues of adopting global classification standards to local environments (2015)
0.09
0.09314062 = product of:
0.124187484 = sum of:
0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 2361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01029941 = score(doc=2361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2361)
0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 2361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066389285 = score(doc=2361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 2361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2361)
0.047498792 = product of:
0.094997585 = sum of:
0.094997585 = weight(_text_:organization in 2361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094997585 = score(doc=2361,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.5284991 = fieldWeight in 2361, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2361)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Ethical issues arise from adapting standardized classification schemes to local environments. Research affirms mutual influences between culture and classification schemes, however, there are various conceptions of culture. Before diving deeper into discussions on designing a culturally sensitive model of classification and providing ethical information services, it is critical to clarify how culture is defined in the literature. In order to gain a deeper understanding of how scholars view the concept of culture, we review, compare, and aggregate discussions on culture from two bodies of literature: knowledge organization and anthropology. Based on the review, we then propose a working definition of culture for knowledge organization research. This definition points to areas of further research concerning culture, ethics, and knowledge organization.
- Content
- Beitrag anlässlich: Proceedings of the 3rd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Knowledge Organization, May 28-29, 2015, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_42_2015_5.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 42(2015) no.5, S.302-307
-
Lee, W.-C.: Challenges and considerations of adapting foreign classification standards (2016)
0.07
0.06878779 = product of:
0.13757558 = sum of:
0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 4945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088519044 = score(doc=4945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 4945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4945)
0.049056537 = product of:
0.098113075 = sum of:
0.098113075 = weight(_text_:organization in 4945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098113075 = score(doc=4945,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.5458315 = fieldWeight in 4945, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4945)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.15
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
-
Lee, W.-C.: Author information for knowledge organization in the digital age (2018)
0.04
0.03803318 = product of:
0.07606636 = sum of:
0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 4831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019420752 = score(doc=4831,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 4831, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4831)
0.056645606 = product of:
0.11329121 = sum of:
0.11329121 = weight(_text_:organization in 4831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11329121 = score(doc=4831,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.6302719 = fieldWeight in 4831, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4831)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.16
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Cho, H.; Disher, T.; Lee, W.-C.; Keating, S.A.; Lee, J.H.: Facet analysis of anime genres : the challenges of defining genre information for popular cultural objects (2018)
0.02
0.020170141 = product of:
0.040340282 = sum of:
0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 4535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01029941 = score(doc=4535,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4535, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4535)
0.030040871 = product of:
0.060081743 = sum of:
0.060081743 = weight(_text_:organization in 4535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060081743 = score(doc=4535,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 4535, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4535)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Anime, as a growing form of multimedia, needs a better and more thorough organization for its myriad unique terminologies. Existing studies show patrons' desire to search and get recommendations for anime. However, due to inadequate indexing and often confusing or inaccurate usage of terms, searching and acquiring recommendations remain challenging. Our research seeks to close the gap and make discovery and recommendations more viable. In this study, we conducted a facet analysis of anime genre terms that are currently used in thirty-six anime-related English-language databases and websites. Using a card sorting method with an inductive approach to the 1,597 terms collected, we identified and defined nine facets and 153 foci terms that describe different genres of anime. Identified terms can be implemented within different organizational systems including library catalogs, recommendation systems, and online databases to improve genre definitions and search experiences.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.6, S.484-499
-
Cho, H.; Disher, T.; Lee, W.-C.; Keating, S.A.; Lee, J.H.: Facet analysis of anime genres : the challenges of defining genre information for popular cultural objects (2020)
0.02
0.020170141 = product of:
0.040340282 = sum of:
0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 5730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01029941 = score(doc=5730,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5730, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5730)
0.030040871 = product of:
0.060081743 = sum of:
0.060081743 = weight(_text_:organization in 5730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060081743 = score(doc=5730,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 5730, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5730)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Anime, as a growing form of multimedia, needs a better and more thorough organization for its myriad unique terminologies. Existing studies show patrons' desire to search and get recommendations for anime. However, due to inadequate indexing and often confusing or inaccurate usage of terms, searching and acquiring recommendations remain challenging. Our research seeks to close the gap and make discovery and recommendations more viable. In this study, we conducted a facet analysis of anime genre terms that are currently used in thirty-six anime-related English-language databases and websites. Using a card sorting method with an inductive approach to the 1,597 terms collected, we identified and defined nine facets and 153 foci terms that describe different genres of anime. Identified terms can be implemented within different organizational systems including library catalogs, recommendation systems, and online databases to improve genre definitions and search experiences.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 47(2020) no.1, S.13-30
-
Lee, H.-L.; Lee, W.-C.: Proclaiming intellectual authority through classification : the case of the seven epitomes (2011)
0.01
0.0053105257 = product of:
0.021242103 = sum of:
0.021242103 = product of:
0.042484205 = sum of:
0.042484205 = weight(_text_:organization in 4295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042484205 = score(doc=4295,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 4295, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4295)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 38(2011) no.1, S.25-42
