Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Lee, W.M."
  • × author_ss:"Sanderson, M."
  1. Lee, W.M.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing URL queries (2010) 0.00
    0.0015457221 = product of:
      0.009274333 = sum of:
        0.009274333 = weight(_text_:in in 4105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009274333 = score(doc=4105,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 4105, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4105)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigated a relatively unexamined query type, queries composed of URLs. The extent, variation, and user click-through behavior was examined to determine the intent behind URL queries. The study made use of a search log from which URL queries were identified and selected for both qualitative and quantitative analyses. It was found that URL queries accounted for ?17% of the sample. There were statistically significant differences between URL queries and non-URL queries in the following attributes: mean query length; mean number of tokens per query; and mean number of clicks per query. Users issuing such queries clicked on fewer result list items higher up the ranking compared to non-URL queries. Classification indicated that nearly 86% of queries were navigational in intent with informational and transactional queries representing about 7% of URL queries each. This is in contrast to past research that suggested that URL queries were 100% navigational. The conclusions of this study are that URL queries are relatively common and that simply returning the page that matches a user's URL is not an optimal strategy.